Originally posted by z4thras
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: The HMRC PR Game
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "The HMRC PR Game"
Collapse
-
Why bother - can't they just make a guess, issue an APN against the DOTAS number and wait for payment/bankruptcy?
-
HMRC have been busy issuing Section 9A enquiry notices for 2012-2013..Originally posted by z4thras View Postone of my colleagues has one such letter .. seems it amounts to 2 pages of A4 questions, including bank statements, loans letters , contracts , how the scheme worked etc not sure they have space for the bait on their fishing trip.
which is what the above is I am sure.
Leave a comment:
-
one of my colleagues has one such letter .. seems it amounts to 2 pages of A4 questions, including bank statements, loans letters , contracts , how the scheme worked etc not sure they have space for the bait on their fishing trip.Originally posted by flamel View PostFor items after 2011 I should have said
Leave a comment:
-
For items after 2011 I should have saidOriginally posted by flamel View PostMy advisers have told me that the next round of hassling letters will be flopping through your postboxes in the next couple of weeks. Think of it as a Christmas Card from Gauke, Grainger and Miss Stopp.
Leave a comment:
-
I wasn't expecting to get the next round of letters until after the settlement offer deadline has passed. Are these reminders that the deadline is looming or are these for schemes that weren't included in the settlement offer (i.e. after 2011)?Originally posted by flamel View PostMy advisers have told me that the next round of hassling letters will be flopping through your postboxes in the next couple of weeks. Think of it as a Christmas Card from Gauke, Grainger and Miss Stopp.
Leave a comment:
-
Hassling letters for what? Are they chasing the settlement letters or planning something else? The deadline for the offer is the 15th Jan.Originally posted by flamel View PostMy advisers have told me that the next round of hassling letters will be flopping through your postboxes in the next couple of weeks. Think of it as a Christmas Card from Gauke, Grainger and Miss Stopp.
Or is this for the post 2011 schemes?
Leave a comment:
-
Thanks for the heads up appreiciated.Originally posted by flamel View PostMy advisers have told me that the next round of hassling letters will be flopping through your postboxes in the next couple of weeks. Think of it as a Christmas Card from Gauke, Grainger and Miss Stopp.
Leave a comment:
-
Ho ho ho
My advisers have told me that the next round of hassling letters will be flopping through your postboxes in the next couple of weeks. Think of it as a Christmas Card from Gauke, Grainger and Miss Stopp.
Leave a comment:
-
Sorry for the delay in posting this. I am currently still hunting out the letter I sent to my MP (in May, as it turns out) and I will post that a.s.a.p.Originally posted by dangerouswhensober View PostI have a template letter (found somewhere else on t'web) which I sent to my MP in July, plus the letter I received in reply from that nice Mr Gauke - I will post both a.s.a.p.
Meanwhile, here is the letter my MP received in reply from that nice Mr Gauke, which he forwarded to me:
https://picasaweb.google.com/1127551...UKE#slideshow/
It contains the usual misinformation - e.g. "HMRC's success in avoidence litigation shows that only a small minority of avoidance schemes are upheld in the courts ..."
Leave a comment:
-
5% at the end of the payment period; another 5% after 5 months; another 5% after 11 months.Originally posted by jbryce View PostHow are penalties going to be calculated on an APN?
The payment period is 90 days from the date of the notice, or longer if you make representations disputing the notice.
Leave a comment:
-
...so you initiate proceedings and wait another 10 years for it to hit the courts!Originally posted by centurian View PostA time limit on APNs simply isn't in the legislation - hence there is no time limit.
However, you can easily forsee that if a time limit were to be introduced in future legislation, it will be weighted on HMRC's side - it will be a time limit for the taxpayer to take action, not HMRC, after which point the APN is considered final settlement.
You can already see their argument. If a taxpayer overpays on PAYE, they have a limited number of years to demand if back - and go to court if HMRC refuse. The argument will be that if a taxpayer believes that their APN represents an overpayment of tax, because they believe their arrangements are legal, then it's up to the taxpayer to initiate proceedings - and if they don't do it within a certain timeframe (probably 6 years), the case is considered closed - and the money lost forever.
How are penalties going to be calculated on an APN?
Leave a comment:
-
A time limit on APNs simply isn't in the legislation - hence there is no time limit.
However, you can easily forsee that if a time limit were to be introduced in future legislation, it will be weighted on HMRC's side - it will be a time limit for the taxpayer to take action, not HMRC, after which point the APN is considered final settlement.
You can already see their argument. If a taxpayer overpays on PAYE, they have a limited number of years to demand if back - and go to court if HMRC refuse. The argument will be that if a taxpayer believes that their APN represents an overpayment of tax, because they believe their arrangements are legal, then it's up to the taxpayer to initiate proceedings - and if they don't do it within a certain timeframe (probably 6 years), the case is considered closed - and the money lost forever.
Leave a comment:
-
I wouldn't bank on that.Originally posted by StrengthInNumbers View Postthat will be great if HMRC has to go to court in a limited time.
Leave a comment:
-
that will be great if HMRC has to go to court in a limited time.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Leave a comment: