• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "The UN impartial? No chance!!"

Collapse

  • Board Game Geek
    replied
    Umm....I know the UN are more or less a paper tiger, but isn't it about time they were given some teeth ?

    Having a load of blue helmet targets who stand in the way of two sides, sounds like condemning soldiers to death.

    Arm them, and arm them real good. Their brief to shoot EITHER side until both sides form a peace treaty. Simple.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mailman
    replied
    Originally posted by AlfredJPruffock
    Did they MM ?

    Could you post the link ?
    Yep, one of the guys that was killed in the strike was emailing his former battalion commander saying the Israelies were bombing their position out of tactical necessity (sp?) and that they had been as close as 3 or 5m with their strikes.

    Ill have a hunt for the linky and post it as soon as I find it.

    Regards

    Mailman

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by oraclesmith
    It's common for troops on the ground to be much less aware of the public relations impact of their actions
    That's what I am saying - in the heat of the battle troops on the groupd whacked anything around targets, especially happens when you take casualties and going berkert trying to avenge your dead buddies.

    Leave a comment:


  • oraclesmith
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW
    That said I think it was just a mistake.
    C'mon, it was no mistake. The Israelis probably got a bit too intense about their fight for survival and reasoned that the sacrifice of a few UN troops was worth it to get rid of maybe a rocket team or two. It's common for troops on the ground to be much less aware of the public relations impact of their actions than the more senior commanders and politicians.

    Leave a comment:


  • AlfredJPruffock
    replied
    Originally posted by Mailman
    And to be even fairer UN observers had reported Hisbulla using the UN position as cover before eventually being taken "care of" by Israel.

    Mailman
    Did they MM ?

    Could you post the link ?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    The whole world - CNN or Christian Science Monitor or just publish it on their website prior to attack. If Israel was supposedly going at pains to leaflet houses so that they will be abandoned by civilians, then they could have done the same for UN - at least make official protest or two before bombing.

    That said I think it was just a mistake.

    Leave a comment:


  • Chico
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW
    And when did Israel complained about such UN activity? Surely they should have gotten all Press of the world to see what UN is allegedly doing, before resorting to bomb attack?
    what you mean the anti-semitic media like the BBC?

    Leave a comment:


  • ratewhore
    replied
    What the UN is doing? In the most part around the world that is feck all squared...

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    And when did Israel complained about such UN activity? Surely they should have gotten all Press of the world to see what UN is allegedly doing, before resorting to bomb attack?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mailman
    replied
    And to be even fairer UN observers had reported Hisbulla using the UN position as cover before eventually being taken "care of" by Israel.

    Mailman

    Leave a comment:


  • mcquiggd
    replied
    To be fair to the israelis, it did take them a good few attempts before they hit the UN outpost.

    If they had been serious, rather than having a bit of a laugh, it would have been over much much quicker...
    Last edited by mcquiggd; 30 August 2006, 21:20.

    Leave a comment:


  • oraclesmith
    replied
    Mind you, I'm not surprised the UN are a bit p*ssed with the Israeli's since the latter blew up four of their observers in a well-marked post in South Lebanon on 25th July.

    Leave a comment:


  • oraclesmith
    replied
    See ... I was right. The media made the real difference in this conflict.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Feck off Chico, you are worse than XSLT!

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    "Why of course the people don't want war... It is the leaders...who
    determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the
    people along...all you have to do is tell them they are being attacked
    and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the
    country to danger. It works the same in any country.

    Hermann Goering

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X