• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "The housing boom isn't a deep problem?"

Collapse

  • alreadypacked
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    thing is though doesn't one of the laws of economics tell us that the value of something is actually what someone else will pay for it?

    so if salaries stay level then house prices cannot really go up because no one can afford them...

    so they either come down or they get subsidised.

    ....

    I have no idea.
    or banks lend you more money.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
    So you bought at the top of the market and paid too much.

    More fool you then.
    Hindsight is a wonderful thing isn't it. I don't recall anyone warning us we were at the top of the market in 2004.

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
    So you bought at the top of the market and paid too much.

    More fool you then.
    It's my style.

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    So that would be like what??

    A tenner??

    At best.

    Oddly I can charge someone that stays there 200% more than I did 10 years ago.

    Leave a comment:


  • TykeMerc
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    I could sell my house in Glasgow for about 8-10% more than i paid for it 10 years ago. Useless.
    So you bought at the top of the market and paid too much.

    More fool you then.

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    I could sell my house in Glasgow for about 8-10% more than i paid for it 10 years ago. Useless.
    So that would be like what??

    A tenner??

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    I could sell my house in Glasgow for about 8-10% more than i paid for it 10 years ago. Useless.

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    thing is though doesn't one of the laws of economics tell us that the value of something is actually what someone else will pay for it?

    so if salaries stay level then house prices cannot really go up because no one can afford them...

    so they either come down or they get subsidised.

    ....

    I have no idea.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    "Of some 14,823 applicants who have used the equity loan arm of the scheme, 77% of these people lived outside London and the South East. This dispels the myth that the scheme is fuelling the London housing bubble because clearly other regions of the country are seeing the most benefit. "

    It is fuelling the bubble everywhere.
    Or deaccelerating the collapse. Perhaps that's why it's there. Take it away and you'd see continuing price falls across most of the country. Political suicide.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    "Of some 14,823 applicants who have used the equity loan arm of the scheme, 77% of these people lived outside London and the South East. This dispels the myth that the scheme is fuelling the London housing bubble because clearly other regions of the country are seeing the most benefit. "

    It is fuelling the bubble everywhere.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    started a topic The housing boom isn't a deep problem?

    The housing boom isn't a deep problem?

    The housing boom isn

    George Osborne has been under increasing pressure to review the Help to Buy scheme, as it has been branded as the catalyst for a ‘housing bubble’. But we really hope that the chancellor does not bow under pressure, as Help to Buy is proving to be of huge benefit to contractors throughout the country, and particularly outside London. Of some 14,823 applicants who have used the equity loan arm of the scheme, 77% of these people lived outside London and the South East. This dispels the myth that the scheme is fuelling the London housing bubble because clearly other regions of the country are seeing the most benefit.
    Surely it's telling us that other parts of the country are being propped up more than London is then? And that an awful lot of people outside of London need help to afford a house. Hardly indicative that there isn't a problem is it...

Working...
X