• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "300 objects scattered over a wide area of ocean"

Collapse

  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
    So they spotted "orange objects" in the new search area. Unthinkable that it could be liferafts I guess.
    Oranges. You heard it here first.

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    So they spotted "orange objects" in the new search area. Unthinkable that it could be liferafts I guess.

    Leave a comment:


  • stek
    replied
    Originally posted by minsky1 View Post
    500 bus stops?
    Oh yes!

    Leave a comment:


  • minsky1
    replied
    Originally posted by stek View Post
    300 objects might seem a tad too many
    300 objects with me and my friend Kenny...

    John Shuttleworth
    500 bus stops?

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by moorfield View Post
    Three things:

    1. 300 objects scattered over a wide area of ocean says to me "explosion" rather than "plane hits ocean at speed and promptly sinks rapidly" - does it not? I am not a pilot, but I have an A-level in Further Maths with Mechanics. Discuss. ...
    Depends on the objects I suppose, but assuming the plane ditched in the ocean at some stage, 300 sounds a pretty modest number of small to medium sized objects, even in the unlikely event everyone was able to slide down the emergency shutes and safely into life rafts, and more so if the plane disintegrated to a greater or lesser extent on impact with the water.

    Also, there are powerful ocean currents and winds round there that would disperse floating objects before long.

    Leave a comment:


  • hyperD
    replied
    Originally posted by suityou01 View Post
    HyperDs alien theory is still at least a proboscis in front.
    FTFY

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    HyperDs alien theory is still at least a nose in front.

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    The new area seems to be based on recalculating where it was likely to crash based on its speed.

    So what about all the debris? Are they now dismissing it?

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    And the search area has moved again

    BBC News - LIVE: Malaysia Airlines flight MH370: Search area shifts

    Leave a comment:


  • Peoplesoft bloke
    replied
    Originally posted by moorfield View Post
    Three things:

    1. 300 objects scattered over a wide area of ocean says to me "explosion" rather than "plane hits ocean at speed and promptly sinks rapidly" - does it not? I am not a pilot, but I have an A-level in Further Maths with Mechanics. Discuss.
    No - explosion would say 30000 bits scattered over a wider area.

    Originally posted by moorfield View Post
    2. Someone somewhere, quite possibly a Bob, has written auto pilot software along the lines of: try {...} catch {fly to south pole}, seriously, and that would not surprise me one jot. Discuss.
    Control software is duplicated and written by separate teams, the systems run in parallel for redundancy - not sure about 777, but Airbus IIRC has at least three versions of anything critical running in real time, precisely so that a bit of bad code doesn't bring the plane down.

    Originally posted by moorfield View Post
    3. I have returned from permiedom. Can I now have my licence back please? Discuss.

    M
    No idea how that works.

    Leave a comment:


  • CoolCat
    replied
    re "Someone somewhere, quite possibly a Bob, has written auto pilot software along the lines of" plenty of life critical stuff has been written by raw grads with limited supervision... lots of it live out there...

    Leave a comment:


  • gricerboy
    replied
    Originally posted by moorfield View Post
    Three things:

    1. 300 objects scattered over a wide area of ocean says to me "explosion" rather than "plane hits ocean at speed and promptly sinks rapidly" - does it not? I am not a pilot, but I have an A-level in Further Maths with Mechanics. Discuss.

    2. Someone somewhere, quite possibly a Bob, has written auto pilot software along the lines of: try {...} catch {fly to south pole}, seriously, and that would not surprise me one jot. Discuss.

    3. I have returned from permiedom. Can I now have my licence back please? Discuss.

    M

    Blimey O'Reilly!

    There's a blast from the past.

    Dennis Wise didn't work out too well did he?

    Leave a comment:


  • hyperD
    replied
    Originally posted by moorfield View Post
    Three things:

    1. 300 objects scattered over a wide area of ocean says to me "explosion" rather than "plane hits ocean at speed and promptly sinks rapidly" - does it not? I am not a pilot, but I have an A-level in Further Maths with Mechanics. Discuss.
    When a plane hits the water at high speed then the kinetic energy of the falling object is very high and the effect is like crashing into concrete which is why most aircraft break up when experiencing an uncontrolled impact into the sea unless, like the Hudson event, it was a controlled landing and a very good one at that, kudos to Sullenberger.

    With the current supposition of the incident that suggests a plane running out of fuel at high altitude and a possible uncontrolled descent into the sea, after 3 weeks of wreckage being exposed to tidal forces, it may well be that it has spread over a large area.

    At the moment, we don't know anything until all the wreckage and flight recorder are identified and found.

    Leave a comment:


  • stek
    replied
    300 objects might seem a tad too many
    300 objects with me and my friend Kenny...

    John Shuttleworth

    Leave a comment:


  • amcdonald
    replied
    Either no ones knows yet, or a government does and is covering it up


    The press though no sod all hence all the crackpot theories

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X