Originally posted by Lockhouse
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Farage vs Clegg
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Farage vs Clegg"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostThe people who wish to stay in the Euro are big businesses. This is because they know they can lobby the EU to build red tape to prevent small companies from taking their markets. For example if you want to sell a sanitation product into the NHS you will need to pay over £1 million to get it tested and certified.. If you wish to put any chemical no matter how safe it is into agriculture (despite the fact thaty already happily use the most toxic of insecticides and polluting fertilisers) - even flower growing it is hundreds of thousands of pounds to get it certified.
Likewise with sealant products or any other building product. In cahoots with the insurance industry and the certification companies we cannot build anything unless it is wrapped up in some kind of heavily capitalised package.
No I think you'll find that those who oppose the free movement of people are, albeit unwittingly, supporting the interests of big businesses who want to move capital and jobs around as they please without the public having the freedom to follow those capital flows.
As for the insurance industry, it's the British government that's put up the most resistance to getting them under some kind of control.
Your fight for liberty and to 'get your country back' is very worthy, but you've picked the wrong enemy.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostThe people who wish to stay in the Euro are big businesses. This is because they know they can lobby the EU to build red tape to prevent small companies from taking their markets. For example if you want to sell a sanitation product into the NHS you will need to pay over £1 million to get it tested and certified.. If you wish to put any chemical no matter how safe it is into agriculture (despite the fact thaty already happily use the most toxic of insecticides and polluting fertilisers) - even flower growing it is hundreds of thousands of pounds to get it certified.
Likewise with sealant products or any other building product. In cahoots with the insurance industry and the certification companies we cannot build anything unless it is wrapped up in some kind of heavily capitalised package.
Leave a comment:
-
I spoke to Nigel Farage after the debate - some UKIP members (including me) met up with him for a pint. He's just a normal bloke who wants his country back.
Leave a comment:
-
The NHS procurement service spends GBP1.6 billion a year on 620,000 products so at GBP1 million corruption cost per product that means, er....Someone might want to go and have a read of: Home | Welcome to NHS Supply Chain or post a flatulant right wing press article which can easily be discredited by a simple bit of research, or is that too hard for a menial telephone sales assistant or whatever you call someone in a call center?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostThe people who wish to stay in the Euro are big businesses. This is because they know they can lobby the EU to build red tape to prevent small companies from taking their markets. For example if you want to sell a sanitation product into the NHS you will need to pay over £1 million to get it tested and certified.. If you wish to put any chemical no matter how safe it is into agriculture (despite the fact thaty already happily use the most toxic of insecticides and polluting fertilisers) - even flower growing it is hundreds of thousands of pounds to get it certified.
Likewise with sealant products or any other building product. In cahoots with the insurance industry and the certification companies we cannot build anything unless it is wrapped up in some kind of heavily capitalised package.
Without proof this is just more hot air which it seems is what the anti-EU brigade are full of. In fact if you really think about it, the EU has actually harmonised product certification so that once your product has been certified then it can be used in all EU countries, in other words 1 certificate - 27 countries so if you didn't have that then, 27 certificates - 27 countries (oh yeah, and 27 million smackers each time!!!)
Since EU legislation harmonizes mandatory requirements for product safety throughout the European Union, a manufacturer only needs to go through the process once and can then export to all 27 EU member states. With appropriate certification, goods travel freely within the borders of the Single Market.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Flashman View Post1.All of those business leaders said the same thing about the Euro. Britain had to join otherwise they would all leave. Yes walk out of the 7th largest economy in the world. Honest guv.
2. See above/
3. Independent UK could choose who came here. Europe, India, wherever.
4. UKIP want to stay in NATO and spend more on defence so we can help our friends and allies all over the world. Just no more cannon fodder for Yankee wars.
Likewise with sealant products or any other building product. In cahoots with the insurance industry and the certification companies we cannot build anything unless it is wrapped up in some kind of heavily capitalised package.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TheCyclingProgrammer View PostActually to be fair, Farage did answer the question. He stated that his wife worked for him for years without remuneration and that he wouldn't be able to do what he does without her help and so she is paid modestly for her work.
Clegg totally avoided the question though.
Hornby: "Is there something, Nigel Farage, a touch hypocritical about you flying out on these free flights and enjoying the restaurants and so on of the parliament here, and enjoyng the gravy train, so-called, life of an MEP? How do you square that circle?"
Farage: "You will remember that right through (the 1999 Euro campaign) that we said we are not going on the gravy train; that we are the only people who are intending, annually, to publish so that the public can inspect them, our expense accounts, our allowance accounts, and the excess that we get - the excess that we are forced to take - particularly on travelling allowances, we are going to be putting into a trust fund and that money will be used to help victims of the European Union in our country, so I do reject the allegation that we’re on the gravy train and there’s certainly no chance of the three of us going native."
Don’t forget that a unanimous resolution passed at the NEC meeting of 17 November 1999 stated: "The NEC re-affirms its control over MEPs expenses and allowances, in accordance with the pledge signed prior to the Euro-election. Substantial allowances are being deposited within MEPs accounts which must come under NEC control for the benefit of the Party. Messrs Stone King, Solicitors, have been approached with a view to setting up the 'Trust Fund' promised to the electorate. The NEC wishes to take matters forward to counteract negative statements in the Press but is reluctant to incur legal expenditure without a guarantee of compliance by the MEPs".
Minutes of the meeting were circulated to branch chairmen and candidates on 24 November 1999 with a covering letter that included: "Enclosed is a copy of the agreement signed by all Euro election candidates prior to June 10th. This is a matter of a serious nature which must be resolved. The Party is not receiving the benefit in the way that was promised to Party members and to the public who voted for us".
The Trust fund was quietly forgotten.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Flashman View Post4. UKIP want to stay in NATO and spend more on defence so we can help our friends and allies all over the world. Just no more cannon fodder for Yankee wars.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by sasguru View PostIf I was Clegg I would have asked the following questions:
1. You realise most businesses in the UK support being in Europe?
2. What will you do when Nissan, JLR, Honda, Mini et. al move out of Britain, as they've said they will, since they're only here for access to the Euro market?
3. You say you want more ties with the Commonwealth rather than Europe - does that mean giving more visas to Indians?
4. How will you pay for your policy of increasing the armed forces and why do you need it since you're against foreign wars?
etc etc etc ad nauseum.
It's not as if UKIP "policy", such as it is, is not riddled with holes.
Instead he defended some of the more dubious Euro practices.
2. See above/
3. Independent UK could choose who came here. Europe, India, wherever.
4. UKIP want to stay in NATO and spend more on defence so we can help our friends and allies all over the world. Just no more cannon fodder for Yankee wars.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by VectraMan View PostLooks like the average is nearly double in Luxembourg compared to the UK. They must be terrified of all 70 million of us turning up overnight looking for jobs.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by VectraMan View PostLooks like the average is nearly double in Luxembourg compared to the UK. They must be terrified of all 70 million of us turning up overnight looking for jobs.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Old Greg View PostInteresting figures here: List of countries in Europe by monthly average wage - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Which IT contractor skills will be top five in 2025? Yesterday 09:08
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
Leave a comment: