• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "The great property crash of the 2040s"

Collapse

  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    Why? Their mortgages should be paid off by the time they retire and pop their clogs.
    Originally posted by alreadypacked View Post
    But the rising cost of fuel, food, maintenance of the house etc. may exceed their income.
    Going by my parents' experience, within 5 or so years of paying off the mortgage the rates plus water rates had jumped to 3-4 times what their mortgage repayments had ever been.

    Leave a comment:


  • RetSet
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    "Buy to Let" means buying a property in order to let it. How it's financed is irrelevant.
    Nope.

    It was just 'landlords' until the BTL product was launched.

    The loans in those days were on commercial terms at lower LTVs. No landlords, not even those who used finance to buy, were referred to as BTL landlords.

    FFS, this is only recent history.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
    You want some baps.
    Or muffins. Or crusty bloomers.

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    Mmm. Bacon.

    I have been making a lot of cheese and ham toasties lately but I think I might make some bacon and egg sarnies tomorrow.
    You want some baps.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
    I thought it was a sandwich.
    Mmm. Bacon.

    I have been making a lot of cheese and ham toasties lately but I think I might make some bacon and egg sarnies tomorrow.

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    "Buy to Let" means buying a property in order to let it. How it's financed is irrelevant.
    I thought it was a sandwich.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by RetSet View Post
    Right. I'm going to get arsey now...

    The term BTL refers specifically to mortgage products for landlords.

    There are numerous other ways that landlords can acquire/ take control of property for their portfolios -

    Cash
    Lease Options
    Instalment Contracts/ Exchange, Delayed Completion
    Rent to Rent
    Various forms of joint venture
    Etc.
    Etc.

    So why does BTL get singled out?
    "Buy to Let" means buying a property in order to let it. How it's financed is irrelevant.

    Leave a comment:


  • RetSet
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    It seems... Blah... Bblah... BTL portfolios ... blah blah..
    Right. I'm going to get arsey now...

    The term BTL refers specifically to mortgage products for landlords.

    There are numerous other ways that landlords can acquire/ take control of property for their portfolios -

    Cash
    Lease Options
    Instalment Contracts/ Exchange, Delayed Completion
    Rent to Rent
    Various forms of joint venture
    Etc.
    Etc.

    So why does BTL get singled out?

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    Perhaps I'm a little person.
    In terms of intelligence, certainly.

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    You told us how much tax you paid, remember?
    From which we worked out your small turnover
    Perhaps I'm a little person.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    Only little people pay tax.
    You told us how much tax you paid, remember?
    From which we worked out your small turnover

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    Only little people pay tax.
    Oompah loompahs?

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Only little people pay tax.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    Only if the population were to fall, which doesn't seem to be the case.
    I read an article 15 years ago that said by 2016 more people would be taking money out of savings that would be saving. But, as you say, that took not account of the amount of population growth.

    I wonder what the equivalent target year is now?

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Everyone I speak to is buying property by the bucket load, it's like 2000 - 2007 on steroids out there.

    Fill yet boots!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X