Originally posted by The Lone Gunman
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Rise in crime is due to elimating risks in everyday life"
Collapse
-
-
Sorry to get this back on track but I think what he is saying is that if you take the risk out of kids lives i.e. give them an unrealistic utopian existance then they will have no fear of reprisals and therefore they will be more likely to push the boundaries to see how far they can go without risk. Basically, don't wrap your kids in cotton wool if you want them to grow up as a well adjusted human being rather than a neanderthal thug
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by oraclesmithBack to the risk thing...... can you explain the reasoning behind Prof Heinz's remarks ?
We take risks, it goes wrong, it hurts. We learn that actions have consequences.
No risk, no lesson. Nothing has consequences.
Sorry for the summary nature but I have lots to do.
Leave a comment:
-
Back to the risk thing...... can you explain the reasoning behind Prof Heinz's remarks ?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by The Lone GunmanYou left the space in. I believe this is regarded as a grammatical error and you are usualy so anal about those .
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by FleetwoodYour point being.....?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by The Lone Gunmanapostrophe!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by FleetwoodOf course you did...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by FleetwoodP r i c k has no apostrophe ! That's correct, isn't it?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lORD lUCANP r i c k has not apostrophe ! That's correct isn't !
P r i c k has no apostrophe! That's correct, isn't it?
Bugger. Too late.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lORD lUCANP r i c k has not apostrophe ! That's correct isn't !
I sentence you to three years in a Grammar Gestapo re-education camp...
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Yesterday 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: