• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Top rate of tax raised to 75%"

Collapse

  • Dactylion
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Income tax in UK was higher in the past - 99.25% during World War 2
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    German was also at war at the time, interesting that "The top personal income tax rate in 1941 was 13.7% in Germany as opposed to 23.7% in Great Britain."
    What is your point again?

    or
    Originally posted by Doggy View Post
    WTF are you on about?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    They had lower taxes during WW1 too, which lead to inflation after the war.

    Reparations didn't help with that of course.
    I reckon losing the war had more to do with inflation than low taxes! And printing money of course!

    Leave a comment:


  • Zero Liability
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    They had lower taxes during WW1 too, which lead to inflation after the war.

    Reparations didn't help with that of course.
    I would think the central bank's profligacy had more to do with inflation than low taxes, which simply soak up the additional currency/credit sloshing about.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    WTF are you on about?
    It appears that Nazi Germany had lower income tax than England during WW2.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zero Liability
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    Yes but it is only a tax on income so who actually earns more than 1 mln per year as a salary (and I am deliveratly discounting business owners who will as others have said move the money around to avoid paying it)

    So you are left with footballers and entertainers really

    oh well

    probably not as crazy as it sounds and especially for footballers they often agree a fee/salary with clubs which is 'after tax' and it is down to the club to ensure they pay them enough to keep the after tax salary figure..
    It's crazy but designed so as to be effectively very limited, is what I think you mean. These sort of headline rates get a lot of support from the envious who want to see the government "punish" the rich (if one thinks footballers or actors are 'overpaid', whatever that means, it's pretty easy to protest that - don't go to their matches or movies! - but I don't think these are the hated rich, anyway, they're too pretty and popular for that), but they rarely are designed to have much of an actual impact on the economy, probably because the political class lacks the conviction of its professed beliefs and only acts so as to benefit itself. A 75% tax rate on the wealthy wouldn't leave them with much of an economy to govern.

    It's similar to the US during the '50s, with all the deductions that applied to the very high marginal tax rates so as to leave the effective tax paid by the 'rich' unchanged, and then only a slim minority of them qualified to pay those very high rates to begin with. It helps give the illusion that the gangster class is "doing something", though.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    So it's ok to have 99.25% income tax so long as country is at war? Interesting you say word "coalition", so presumably they had to agree on some middle point for taxation - 99.25%, what do you reckon Cons wanted to set it to - 99.05%, but Labour insisted on 99.50%, so they got 99.25% in the end!??!?!

    And what did the National Govt do to tax cheats during those years?

    German was also at war at the time, interesting that "The top personal income tax rate in 1941 was 13.7% in Germany as opposed to 23.7% in Great Britain."

    Economy of Nazi Germany - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    I can't actually remember the tax rate in Soviet Union as I did not work, actually I don't think there was one at all, that's right - 0% income tax - there were some effective compulsory union membership payments but they were small.
    WTF are you on about?

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Yes but it is only a tax on income so who actually earns more than 1 mln per year as a salary (and I am deliveratly discounting business owners who will as others have said move the money around to avoid paying it)

    So you are left with footballers and entertainers really

    oh well

    probably not as crazy as it sounds and especially for footballers they often agree a fee/salary with clubs which is 'after tax' and it is down to the club to ensure they pay them enough to keep the after tax salary figure..

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by Ruprect View Post
    in france:

    BBC News - France's 75% tax rate gains approval by top court

    Jesus wept - lefty politicians really don't get it do they?
    daft lefty French voters

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    It was 102% for a while on unearned income.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by KentPhilip View Post
    I suspect that's because there there was 0% pay.
    Your suspicions are incorrect.

    The problem was actually buying some desireable stuff for the money given - certainly outside Moscow

    Leave a comment:


  • KentPhilip
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post

    I can't actually remember the tax rate in Soviet Union as I did not work, actually I don't think there was one at all, that's right - 0% income tax - there were some effective compulsory union membership payments but they were small.
    I suspect that's because there there was 0% pay.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    The National government, a coalition of all parties. We were at war.
    So it's ok to have 99.25% income tax so long as country is at war? Interesting you say word "coalition", so presumably they had to agree on some middle point for taxation - 99.25%, what do you reckon Cons wanted to set it to - 99.05%, but Labour insisted on 99.50%, so they got 99.25% in the end!??!?!

    And what did the National Govt do to tax cheats during those years?

    German was also at war at the time, interesting that "The top personal income tax rate in 1941 was 13.7% in Germany as opposed to 23.7% in Great Britain."

    Economy of Nazi Germany - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    I can't actually remember the tax rate in Soviet Union as I did not work, actually I don't think there was one at all, that's right - 0% income tax - there were some effective compulsory union membership payments but they were small.
    Last edited by AtW; 29 December 2013, 23:10.

    Leave a comment:


  • hyperD
    replied
    Originally posted by Bunk View Post
    And with it being temporary, people earning that kind of money will just work out a way to defer it until taxes go back down.
    WHS.

    Political grandstanding. Those that have that wealth never do pay that amount.

    Remember these are political parasites. They don't give a tulip about important stuff, only their next re-election. If you said you want to abolish politics they'd still enthusiastically endorse it if it meant they'd still be on their gravy train and you'd bung 'em a rent boy in the mix.

    It's in their DNA. They can't help it.

    The sort of individual that declares they want to be a politician should automatically be barred from ever becoming one.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    99.25% tax is pretty crazy even if it was Inter-Galactic War. Who was in charge during the war here - socialists?
    The National government, a coalition of all parties. We were at war.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Bunk View Post
    And with it being temporary, people earning that kind of money will just work out a way to defer it until taxes go back down.
    Aye, those who can will defer (or pay in advance) for sure - same as it happened with 50% tax here which was estimated to have raised FA compared to declared target.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X