• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Millionaire Women

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Millionaire Women"

Collapse

  • AlfredJPruffock
    replied
    Originally posted by Fleetwood
    Have just PM'd you, Alf...

    Excellent Fleet.

    The geese fly on Thursday evening.

    The Chinese Watch.

    Mother.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Maybe Chico's Church was right when it banned divorces...

    Leave a comment:


  • hyperD
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW
    A solution would be to make both parties that already give oath to live together in bad times and good times, to take poison anti-dote from which is made of their one respective genetical material. This would ensure that marriages are cemented forever.

    Another practical solution from ATW.
    Oh, you Shakespearean Bard-esque, Romeo y Julieta-like cuddely commie you!

    Leave a comment:


  • Fleetwood
    replied
    Have just PM'd you, Alf...

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    A solution would be to make both parties that already give oath to live together in bad times and good times, to take poison anti-dote from which is made of their one respective genetical material. This would ensure that marriages are cemented forever.

    Another practical solution from ATW.

    Leave a comment:


  • AlfredJPruffock
    replied
    Originally posted by hyperD
    Clogs! All males need to band together. I know a friend of mine who got married to this wierdo bint, and as is with British reserve, we all sang praises to her in front of him publicly, while behind his back we slagged the troglodyte off to kingdom come.

    Needless to say, they divorced after she shagged some Bangalore monkey and the poor guy was left with nothing, as the UK law says that, despite adultery, she gets half, in spite of contributing nothing over those years.

    The laws have gone to far in extremis, to the point where men cannot divorce their wives for fear of losing their only "perceived" form of wealth. Whereas I commend the vultures for progressing the marriage laws from the male Victorian bias, I fear the liberals have taken it an abridge too far.
    Aye HyperD

    Ive been thinking long and hard about this and thank goodness Ive never been hitched,the thought of some bint getting her grubby spade into my estate after making off with some cad from Helsinki is frankly too much too contemplate.


    Ive read too many disaster stories with men being taken to the cleaners, even my little sister warned me the other day of watch out for scheming gold diggers who might have Pruffocks Hamilton Mansions in their schemes.


    So what is called for ?

    Pills ?
    The Whip?
    Castration ?
    Outsourcing of ones Love Life ?
    Last edited by AlfredJPruffock; 14 August 2006, 12:59.

    Leave a comment:


  • hyperD
    replied
    Originally posted by Fleetwood
    A jounalist asked Paul McCartney if he would ever consider going down on one knee again.

    He replied : "Please ! Call her Heather ...."

    (I'll get me coat)

    Leave a comment:


  • Fleetwood
    replied
    A journalist asked Paul McCartney if he would ever consider going down on one knee again.

    He replied : "Please ! Call her Heather ...."

    (I'll get me coat)
    Last edited by Fleetwood; 14 August 2006, 12:40.

    Leave a comment:


  • Asterix
    replied
    Perv

    I reckon he knew about her past as a porn star, that's why he went for her. Linda (his 1st wife) was the opposite, so not tarty. Lust must have got the better of him. He'll probably use that against her if she tries to be too greedy.

    Leave a comment:


  • GreenerGrass
    replied
    Originally posted by Asterix
    Look at this one-legged minger Mills, she's due for min £ 50 m. What a stupid **** that McCartney is despite his money ! Not the only one either. It seems to me that the average British male spends more time in looking for a new laptop than a potential wife. Half of us get to marry British with no checks on family background, friends or anything. The rest seem to go for anything foreign, inc ex-prostitutes from Eastern Europe and the Far East, a bit of Afro-Caribbean or asylum-seekers whose background is impossible to trace even for the Home Office. Reap what you sow.
    She was much prettier than Linda, but its a high price to pay, probably over a million quid per blow job, thats if he's even had 50 off her which I personally doubt. Do you think she takes the leg off during bedroom nonsense?

    Leave a comment:


  • Asterix
    replied
    Whose fault is it ?

    Look at this one-legged minger Mills, she's due for min £ 50 m. What a stupid **** that McCartney is despite his money ! Not the only one either. It seems to me that the average British male spends more time in looking for a new laptop than a potential wife. Half of us get to marry British with no checks on family background, friends or anything. The rest seem to go for anything foreign, inc ex-prostitutes from Eastern Europe and the Far East, a bit of Afro-Caribbean or asylum-seekers whose background is impossible to trace even for the Home Office. Reap what you sow.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Another good reason to live on benefits...

    Leave a comment:


  • Fleetwood
    replied
    Originally posted by hyperD
    Whereas I commend the vultures for progressing the marriage laws from the male Victorian bias, I fear the liberals have taken it an abridge too far.
    Exactly. Under French law, anything you owned before a marriage will be yours in the event of a divorce. Simple,really.

    Leave a comment:


  • hyperD
    replied
    Clogs! All males need to band together. I know a friend of mine who got married to this wierdo bint, and as is with British reserve, we all sang praises to her in front of him publicly, while behind his back we slagged the troglodyte off to kingdom come.

    Needless to say, they divorced after she shagged some Bangalore monkey and the poor guy was left with nothing, as the UK law says that, despite adultery, she gets half, in spite of contributing nothing over those years.

    The laws have gone to far in extremis, to the point where men cannot divorce their wives for fear of losing their only "perceived" form of wealth. Whereas I commend the vultures for progressing the marriage laws from the male Victorian bias, I fear the liberals have taken it an abridge too far.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fleetwood
    replied
    I received money from the former Mme. Fleetwood in our divorce settlement.
    So there.

    F in "Vive French divorce law" mode

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X