Working on a Sunday - Contractor UK Bulletin Board

Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

bogeyman replied

13 August 2006, 12:52
Originally posted by Churchill

<SNAP>

Sod this for a game of soldiers I'm off for a pint.(or two...)

Cheers!

Ha! Admitting defeat then?

Must admit, pub is a good idea though.

Later.
Leave a comment:
bogeyman replied

13 August 2006, 12:45
Originally posted by AtW

Careful bogey, you are talking to a Supreme Spod...

Should I be impressed or something?
Leave a comment:
Churchill replied

13 August 2006, 12:45
Originally posted by bogeyman

I doubt that from your avatar - it should be poking out in front of you if that were the case.

Anyway young pup, I was coding assembler when I was a spotty youth back in the 1970's. So don't try to intimidate me with your registers!

<SNAP>

Sod this for a game of soldiers I'm off for a pint.(or two...)

Cheers!
Leave a comment:
AtW replied

13 August 2006, 12:44
Originally posted by Churchill

Now why did you have to go and do that?

First meetings warrant introductions...
Leave a comment:
bogeyman replied

13 August 2006, 12:42
Originally posted by Churchill

Yeah, and my dick is bigger than yours too!

I doubt that from your avatar - it should be poking out in front of you if that were the case.

Anyway young pup, I was coding assembler when I was a spotty youth back in the 1970's. So don't try to intimidate me with your registers!
Leave a comment:
Churchill replied

13 August 2006, 12:41
Originally posted by AtW

Careful bogey, you are talking to a Supreme Spod...

Now why did you have to go and do that?

Just when Bogey was given enough rope...
Leave a comment:
AtW replied

13 August 2006, 12:40
Careful bogey, you are talking to a Supreme Spod...
Leave a comment:
Churchill replied

13 August 2006, 12:38
Originally posted by bogeyman

So you obviously think you know it all then.

Yeah, and my dick is bigger than yours too!
Leave a comment:
bogeyman replied

13 August 2006, 12:38
Originally posted by Churchill

Wrong!

Embedded C, C++, Assembler(processors too numerous to mention).

So you obviously think you know it all then.
Leave a comment:
AtW replied

13 August 2006, 12:37
Yeah I suppose they are behind, but I think new Office is more .NET oriented.
Leave a comment:
Churchill replied

13 August 2006, 12:37
Originally posted by bogeyman

I'm guessing you're a Java jockey then Churchill

Anyway, never mind. Found what I wanted.

For anyone who's interested...

ftp://ftp.wdj.com/pub/webzip/newslet...0030715dnn.zip

Wrong!

Embedded C, C++, Assembler(processors too numerous to mention).
Leave a comment:
bogeyman replied

13 August 2006, 12:36
Originally posted by AtW

This kind of stuff should be in Office SDK.

It is, but only for conventional VC++ code operating on OLE2 interfaces.

Was hoping someone had written a .NET wrapper for ::StgOpenStorageEx() and all that bollox in managed C++, and funny enough, someone has. God bless 'em!
Leave a comment:
AtW replied

13 August 2006, 12:31
This kind of stuff should be in Office SDK.
Leave a comment:
bogeyman replied

13 August 2006, 12:30
Originally posted by Churchill

.NET?

Might as well call it .CRAP!

So there!

I'm guessing you're a Java jockey then Churchill

Anyway, never mind. Found what I wanted.

For anyone who's interested...

ftp://ftp.wdj.com/pub/webzip/newslet...0030715dnn.zip
Leave a comment:
Churchill replied

13 August 2006, 12:25
.NET?

Might as well call it .CRAP!

So there!
Leave a comment: