• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Thanks to the Today programme"

Collapse

  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by expat View Post
    On Today this morning the professor who spoke was talking about the possibility of a huge percentage of people incubating it, with incubation periods of up to 50 years. Not out of the woods yet.
    Either not out of the woods, or the prof was looking for continued funding.

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    It also seems to depend on your personal genetics, this MV, MM, and VV thingie seems to control to some extent the speed at which it progresses.

    Which is a happy thought.

    It certainly ain't over yet coz the fat lady definitely hasn't sung.

    I'd give it at least 100 years, if not more.

    Predicting susceptibility and incubation time ... [Lancet Neurol. 2006] - PubMed - NCBI

    Oh lovely.
    Just one of a long line of "there is no evidence....".
    Smoking was once said even to be healthy.
    Sugar is not yet sufficiently demonised.
    vCJD could be lurking for a lifetime.
    In non-chemical areas, long-term results from mobile phone masts everywhere are some way off yet. I'm sure they're safe really.

    I do know that we'll all die, I'd just rather it were later.

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by russell View Post
    I remembering reading about it in the 90's, it was all over the papers about a potential epidemic. Looks like it is almost gone.
    On Today this morning the professor who spoke was talking about the possibility of a huge percentage of people incubating it, with incubation periods of up to 50 years. Not out of the woods yet.

    Leave a comment:


  • russell
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost View Post
    At 6:50 this morning they started talking about vCJD.

    The mother of Claire McVey spoke.

    Which, naturally, leads one to google and to find this:

    An unthinkable death

    Stone me.

    Horrific.

    Interesting table:

    http://www.cjd.ed.ac.uk/documents/figs.pdf
    I remembering reading about it in the 90's, it was all over the papers about a potential epidemic. Looks like it is almost gone.

    Leave a comment:


  • zeitghost
    started a topic Thanks to the Today programme

    Thanks to the Today programme

    At 6:50 this morning they started talking about vCJD.

    The mother of Claire McVey spoke.

    Which, naturally, leads one to google and to find this:

    An unthinkable death

    Stone me.

    Horrific.

    Interesting table:

    http://www.cjd.ed.ac.uk/documents/figs.pdf
    Last edited by zeitghost; 27 November 2013, 12:12.

Working...
X