- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Domain squatters
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Domain squatters"
Collapse
-
I nearly worked for an online ticket touting service this year but bombed out in the first day. I have too many morals.
-
Originally posted by Dundeegeorgesome nasty entrepreneurs have gambled some money that people will want to buy the domain names they own, and now I want one, it's not fair.
Jesus H Christ, have I signed onto the ******* caravanners' board by accident.
Contractors my arse. Is anyone here 'asset-rich cash-poor' and getting rid of their buy-to-let?
(Hit's throat a la Pete) 'Hwankers, hah''
Domain name pimps are scum the same as ticket touts are scum. If you think differently, you remind me of a little Irish saying. “You’re a waanker”
Leave a comment:
-
Oh help me help me Mr. Marx
some nasty entrepreneurs have gambled some money that people will want to buy the domain names they own, and now I want one, it's not fair.Originally posted by TheMonkeyTrading standards would be on their arse!
Jesus H Christ, have I signed onto the ******* caravanners' board by accident.
Contractors my arse. Is anyone here 'asset-rich cash-poor' and getting rid of their buy-to-let?
(Hit's throat a la Pete) 'Hwankers, hah''
Leave a comment:
-
It's amazing what you can find:
the domain squatter in person...
Angus Hanton

35 Giant Arches Road, London SE24 9HP
020 7737 0070
Happy happy libelous bollocks
Leave a comment:
-
If Birdseye bought all peas in the UK and then tried to score big time by raising prices 100 times, then relevant authorities will kick their butt (or eye) so hard that they would not be able to walk (see).Originally posted by The Lone GunmanBirdseye buy up all the peas they want and then charge what they like at the supermarkets.
Leave a comment:
-
They have not destroyed any of it. It is all up for sale. Using your food example. Birdseye buy up all the peas they want and then charge what they like at the supermarkets. You can still buy peas but they will not be the quality peas you wanted.Originally posted by AtWok, go then buy all supplies of food, destroy 90% of it and make profit on remaining, I am sure you will get a medal for that.
Leave a comment:
-
ok, go then buy all supplies of food, destroy 90% of it and make profit on remaining, I am sure you will get a medal for that.
Leave a comment:
-
Oh no it wouldn't.Originally posted by AtWThis would be anti-competitive behavior.
Leave a comment:
-
Cybersquatter don't make domain - a closer analogy would be if some Ferrari dealer bought all of them, destroyed 90% and hiked prices for remaining 10% by 100 times to make up for destroyed ones plus really big profit. This would be anti-competitive behavior.Originally posted by Emperor DalekNo one else makes Ferraris and I can't afford any of their cars.
Leave a comment:
-
Honour and Money do not belong in the same purseOriginally posted by AtWNominet is a monopoly in the UK.
The behavior of cybersquatting companies who buy lots of domains from registars is a classic example of anti-competitive behavior: restricting supply of goods or services and charging a lot more for small part of such supply sold: they do not add any value, a domain is an electronic thing that is not made any better by having bought it, so price hike from $10 to $500 or more is purely speculative.
Let's just leave it at that.
Leave a comment:
-
I think Ferrari are operating an anti-competitive monopolistic business. No one else makes Ferraris and I can't afford any of their cars. I demand to be protected from such gouging.
Leave a comment:
-
I have a right to be protected from anti-competitive behavior and monolies - such right is upheld in real life but in cyberspace they are getting away with it.Originally posted by The Lone GunmanYou have no right to a particular domain name and if some enterprising chap is willing to take a punt then let them.
Leave a comment:
-
Nominet is a monopoly in the UK.
The behavior of cybersquatting companies who buy lots of domains from registars is a classic example of anti-competitive behavior: restricting supply of goods or services and charging a lot more for small part of such supply sold: they do not add any value, a domain is an electronic thing that is not made any better by having bought it, so price hike from $10 to $500 or more is purely speculative.
Let's just leave it at that.
Leave a comment:
-
There is no excuse for going in the sweet shop and buying ALL the push pops so you can sell them to the children for £19250 each (the precise markup of these squatters).
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Leave a comment: