Originally posted by CoolCat
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: British Telecom
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "British Telecom"
Collapse
-
WHS ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-
They need to hire people so they can be seen to be getting rid of people to keep the shareholders happy.Originally posted by CoolCat View PostIts often a lot more than that, and often in skills they are simultaneously trying to hire. People can leave with the top staff rating (aka big bonus for supposedly being good at their job, although a lot of bum licking is involved) and two years pay lump sum additionally after as little as two years service.
Worse than that I have seen them hire tens of people, who all on their first day as new starters were given 6 months pay and asked not to come back!
Not to mention the corrupt goings on with their embedded Indian outsourcers.
Clueless they are
Leave a comment:
-
Its often a lot more than that, and often in skills they are simultaneously trying to hire. People can leave with the top staff rating (aka big bonus for supposedly being good at their job, although a lot of bum licking is involved) and two years pay lump sum additionally after as little as two years service.Originally posted by bless 'em all View Post
4 weeks pay for every year of service +10% 'early leaving' bonus.
Worse than that I have seen them hire tens of people, who all on their first day as new starters were given 6 months pay and asked not to come back!
Not to mention the corrupt goings on with their embedded Indian outsourcers.
Clueless they are
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by CoolCat View Postcontinually offering voluntary redundancy to their entire workforce so that the best always leave
4 weeks pay for every year of service +10% 'early leaving' bonus.
Leave a comment:
-
BT = Bangalore Telecom, and they are a national disgrace, their main claim to fame being importing tens of thousands of workers into the country on ICT work visas from India, many of which have now gone onto having British passports, continually offering voluntary redundancy to their entire workforce so that the best always leave, and other wide and various bad business practises.
Leave a comment:
-
What amateur allows others to collect money from their account?
Leave a comment:
-
Direct Debit = someone has control of when and how much money to take from your account.
Standing order = YOU have the control.
Leave a comment:
-
If it wasnt for Thatcher £5000 a month would have been the discount rate for their services.Originally posted by AtW View PostWhy won't you blame Thatcher for breaking up BT's monopoly and selling them off?
Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment:
-
British Telecom
My accounts person is away on holiday so I went to check whether we had been paid £13k by one of our client only to see an £8k increase in the balance. I dug a bit deeper thinking maybe it was an HMRC direct debit for VAT or something. It was indeed a DD but it was BT that had helped themselves to £5000 from our account. Now considering that we only pay £150 per month to these people I thought this was a bit strange. Had we not paid them for the last 3 years or what I thought? No every month had been paid. Fortunately I think I caught it in time to cancel the Direct Debit and it should be returned tomorrow.
I am going to be on their case tomorrow. What a damn cheek.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Today 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Yesterday 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58

Leave a comment: