• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "All is fair in love and war"

Collapse

  • mudskipper
    replied
    Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
    Well nip out to the offie and get us some cold ones theres a love.
    Nip out to the grammar shop and get yourself some punctuation, there's a dear.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
    With great power comes great responsibility.

    With no power the fridge doesn't work and the beer is warm.
    Well nip out to the offie and get us some cold ones theres a love.

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    With great power comes great responsibility.

    With no power the fridge doesn't work and the beer is warm.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    If it were me I'd mix the nasty tulip with laughing gas, MDMA or cocaine. At least they'd die with a smile on their faces.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    Did you know, the stone age men used to make three types of arrow.

    the first type was cylindrical, pointy and was used for training and target practice.

    the second type was arrow headed shaped, but smooth. So that if you didnt kill the prey, the arrow would fall out so it could be recovered.

    The third type was similar to the second except it had barbs. The barbs meant it would not come out. The only way to get it out was to cut a great big 'ole. It was designed to maximise the pain, suffering and death of the target. It was used aginst other stone age men.

    The modern bullet has a full metal jacket to reduce the probability of disintegrating and is designed to turn in the body to make a nasty hole. It's basically designed to maim rather than kill so that the enemy has to suffer the overhead of evacuating and treating their wounded.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Did you know, the stone age men used to make three types of arrow.

    the first type was cylindrical, pointy and was used for training and target practice.

    the second type was arrow headed shaped, but smooth. So that if you didnt kill the prey, the arrow would fall out so it could be recovered.

    The third type was similar to the second except it had barbs. The barbs meant it would not come out. The only way to get it out was to cut a great big 'ole. It was designed to maximise the pain, suffering and death of the target. It was used aginst other stone age men.




    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Chemical weapons, if done right, could result in quick and painless deaths. Surely that would be an improvement over maiming and burning people with high explosives and fast moving pieces of hot metal and rubble.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    No kicking in the bollocks and no kicking a man when he's down. It's just not cricket.

    Leave a comment:


  • KentPhilip
    replied
    +1

    All the guff introduced in pursuance of "rules of war" only constrain those who are not really at war.
    At the end of the day such concepts as "the geneva convention", the "league of nations", and "the united nations" are powerless and irrelevant (the latter being shown in the past week with Cameron and Obama ignoring the United Nations and going to war with Syria in any case.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Ok I'll play a bit.
    Those who dispute the statement I agreed with above, probably will be the first to say that the use of atomic weapons on civilians saved thousands of military lives in WW2. So what's the moral beef about killing civilians horribly?*

    *Just to make it clear I don't agree with this. Just noting that the hypocrisy of our approach to the Syria situation stinks to high heaven.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    War is a nasty business. Attempting to constrain human behaviour in wartime, or judge some methods of killing & maiming as better than others, are both futile and prone to make fools & hypocrites of us all.
    Yes.
    HTH.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    started a topic All is fair in love and war

    All is fair in love and war

    The rules of war should be abolished and those fighting it should be as free to wreak havoc as nature made them.

    War is a nasty business. Attempting to constrain human behaviour in wartime, or judge some methods of killing & maiming as better than others, are both futile and prone to make fools & hypocrites of us all.

    discuss.

Working...
X