Originally posted by bobspud
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: How Britain avoided double dipping
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "How Britain avoided double dipping"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by GB9 View PostYou can hardly blame Osbourne for the point at which he started.
LibCons are just following more or less same policy as the Labour did which has got only one real aspect - print money to avoid bursting of the consumer real estate bubble.
Ok, he cut 50% income tax to 45%, but it's not like many people paid 50% in the first place.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bobspud View PostWorks both ways though. I am in the process of buying an SL mercedes. (2nd one I will have owned but first one from new) the first one was an SL320 it cost its first owner over £80k in 2000 I bought it in 2004 for 22k My new one will be an SL350 and will cost me £77k and in four years will be worth 22k ... If the way you are thinking was true I would have to spend 100k to have achieved the same thing. So why if I am buying a foreign car in a devalued currency (and one that is considerably weaker against the Euro than it was in 2000) but getting more for my money instead of less?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bobspud View PostWorks both ways though. I am in the process of buying an SL mercedes. (2nd one I will have owned but first one from new) the first one was an SL320 it cost its first owner over £80k in 2000 I bought it in 2004 for 22k My new one will be an SL350 and will cost me £77k and in four years will be worth 22k ... If the way you are thinking was true I would have to spend 100k to have achieved the same thing. So why if I am buying a foreign car in a devalued currency (and one that is considerably weaker against the Euro than it was in 2000) but getting more for my money instead of less?
Although I must admit, any decent contractor still wouldn’t. But then any decent contractor never went to 450.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Paddy View PostCars are not commodities. Compare income with the cost of fuel, food, gas and water.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bobspud View PostWorks both ways though. I am in the process of buying an SL mercedes. (2nd one I will have owned but first one from new) the first one was an SL320 it cost its first owner over £80k in 2000 I bought it in 2004 for 22k My new one will be an SL350 and will cost me £77k and in four years will be worth 22k ... If the way you are thinking was true I would have to spend 100k to have achieved the same thing. So why if I am buying a foreign car in a devalued currency (and one that is considerably weaker against the Euro than it was in 2000) but getting more for my money instead of less?
Leave a comment:
-
If you take out the massive boom and the following bust, then we have had very gentle growth this decade. You can hardly blame Osbourne for the point at which he started. Labour got us to an unsustainable peak, and although they wiped a lot off in one quarter (near 7%) there was still a bit to go.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Paddy View PostThis shows that smoke and mirrors have fooled you into thing you earn more. Your 600 Groats are not the same value as five years ago. The Bank of England has ‘printed’ money thus devaluing it. There has also been global devaluation (first time in history). There has also been Global inflation due to banks buying into commodities and hedge funds. Your 600 Groats are worth about 400 in real terms, maybe even 300 or less.
Leave a comment:
-
I avoided double dipping once by teble dipping. Or was that just a dream?
Leave a comment:
-
Everyone is talking about how much their house is worth again, so the magic seems to work.
In Britain as long as your house is going up, the economy is mended. Simples.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bobspud View PostThe bit you all seem to miss is that Economics is an exact replacement for voodoo. The followers of voodoo magic knew that you had to believe in it before the powers could work on you. Same for economics. We are all going to hell in a handbasket (by economic standards and yet watch a premier league match on TV or the Ashes or any large sporting / entertainment venue and you will see the seats are full. The pubs on a saturday night in the town centres are still full of the drinking classes and the other week I went shopping in Bath and struggled to find a parking space.
My rate at the start of the year was a solemn 450 a day by april it was back to 525 and now I am getting sniffs and agents starting to take 600 + as a goer. So if they are indeed lying then the lies are working and sooner or later they will inflate the issue into irrelevance. But some twat that looks at figures backwards as a way to tell me what will happen tomorrow is a modern day catweazle throwing dust at imaginary dragons...
Leave a comment:
-
Does anyone else imagine a giant chutney spoon hovering over the midlands when they read this title?
Only me then?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by zeitghostHe and CMD are The New Neros.
Fiddling whilst Britain burns.
My rate at the start of the year was a solemn 450 a day by april it was back to 525 and now I am getting sniffs and agents starting to take 600 + as a goer. So if they are indeed lying then the lies are working and sooner or later they will inflate the issue into irrelevance. But some twat that looks at figures backwards as a way to tell me what will happen tomorrow is a modern day catweazle throwing dust at imaginary dragons...
Leave a comment:
-
"That’s not a double dip. It is a depression." - well a depression is a drop of 10% in growth which has not happened.
But the economy is 4% beneath its peak and will probably flatline for years. Economy is supposed to grow at 2% a year to stay still - so thats another 10% we are missing too.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostWell done George Osbourne.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Yesterday 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Nov 27 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
Leave a comment: