Originally posted by EternalOptimist
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Gents, help needed; fit or fugly?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Gents, help needed; fit or fugly?"
Collapse
-
I want to know what she's thinking.
She is obviously thinking of something.
'Before I drop me kecks and tear your knickers down and slip you a crippler, it is imperitive that I know what you are thinking my dear'
Marquise de sade - 1429 'the case of the bum-busted police woman'
Leave a comment:
-
I'd be right in there like a man with no arms. I might not be very pretty but I'm very fussy and she'd do it for me no probs. Do you really need to ask?Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostYes folks it's time to play 'Casual Sexism' again!!!
Last night I watched Luther on BBC for the first time, and was struck by the sight of the Alice Morgan character played by Ruth Wilson. Something funny about her upper lip and really she's a bit too thin for my taste, but something about her is really very sexy.
So what do we say? Fit or fugly? Would you? (I think I would)

There's conventionally pretty and then there's something different that could be quite special and ol' Ruth has definitley got it.
Leave a comment:
-
We find ourselves in agreement again.Originally posted by Lockhouse View PostYes. I would. Much better than the stereotype Hollywood blonde.
Leave a comment:
-
I went to a girls' school. Pretty sure the inability to deal with boys was a factor in getting knocked up at 16.Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostJust as well you did not go to a girl's boarding school then.
Leave a comment:
-
Just as well you did not go to a girl's boarding school then.Originally posted by mudskipper View PostMy first snog was with a girl. It was at a Christian Union camp when I was about 10.
I'm not gay, but I don't find the idea of sex with a woman repulsive. I just find blokes more attractive.
Leave a comment:
-
she looks like the offspring of Tracey Emin and Mick Jagger who some how managed to avoid the completely ugly genesOriginally posted by Mich the Tester View PostYes folks it's time to play 'Casual Sexism' again!!!
Last night I watched Luther on BBC for the first time, and was struck by the sight of the Alice Morgan character played by Ruth Wilson. Something funny about her upper lip and really she's a bit too thin for my taste, but something about her is really very sexy.
So what do we say? Fit or fugly? Would you? (I think I would)

Leave a comment:
-
probably, she isn't fit enough to be choosy!Originally posted by worzelGummidge View PostThe real question is, would she actually "do" any of you lot?
Leave a comment:
-
That's actually quite cool in a public schoolish kind of way.Originally posted by mudskipper View PostMy first snog was with a girl. It was at a Christian Union camp when I was about 10.
Leave a comment:
-
My first snog was with a girl. It was at a Christian Union camp when I was about 10.Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostShe's so far in she's in Narnia.
I'm not gay, but I don't find the idea of sex with a woman repulsive. I just find blokes more attractive.
Leave a comment:
-
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Yesterday 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36
- The Fair Work Agency has got zero hours in its sights. Do you? Jul 16 08:44
- Cookie Policy Jul 15 11:50
- Cloned again: an umbrella company founder's warning on fraud, JSL and Companies House Jul 15 07:47
- How is JSL bedding in for contractor umbrella companies, 100 days in? Jul 14 07:45

Leave a comment: