Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "What really happened to the "Twin Towers""
The main problem with the theory of the steel support shafts melting due to the heat of a fire is the speed the building came down. In under an hour a fire managed to melt a steel structure that ran from the top to the bottom of the twin towers despite the fact that there are pictures of people standing in the hole the plane made and the fact that NYFD got firefighters up to the 78th floor and they thought they could put the fire out.
Hardly an inferno and nowhere near enough time to heat up a steel structure the size of WTC1/2 enough to melt it....
There is some wierdness about it. There was an incident about 2 hours before the towers got hit which has always intrigued me.
The company I was working for (undisclosed as I'll get in trouble) had offices there at which the staff were myseteriously told to leave the building and go home. At the time, they were contracted to provide infrastructure to the department of defence which is a little suspect if you ask me.
Were they the night shift? The first hit was 8:45am! Which means they went home at 6:45am.
Last edited by wendigo100; 19 September 2006, 08:42.
There is some wierdness about it. There was an incident about 2 hours before the towers got hit which has always intrigued me.
The company I was working for (undisclosed as I'll get in trouble) had offices there at which the staff were myseteriously told to leave the building and go home. At the time, they were contracted to provide infrastructure to the department of defence which is a little suspect if you ask me.
If this is true I would disclose this to the press.
Why are we at war with Eurasia? Why would it take a war to cick tulip out of Sommerville, Clarke and Bell and what was so wrong with the music........... oh Eurasia! I'll get me coat.
I didn't think Somerville was ever in Erasure. He was a poof though.
Also, rather interestingly, there was a plane that allegedly crashed into the pentagon. However, there is a distinct lack of imagery/video of the incident and all CCTV footage of that time was impounded by the aforementioned 'authorities'. The only pictures seem to be of a building with a hole in it and no damage to the grass immediately in front and no bits of plane scattered about the place as one would expect.
I love a good conspiracy theory, makes the morning go with a zing.
There is a whole website dedicated to pictures showing that the one thing missing from the pentagon site was a boeing!
The hole is too small, it hit an area that was under work and therefore virtually empty. The hole is so low the plane would needed to have been flown almost at ground level. This by a pilot who at best had only flown single seat aircraft and simulators!
Once you question the Pentagon, one cannot take any other things said at face value either.
The last ten minutes someone describes how there was a planned power blackout in the towers on the 8 & 9th of September 2001 and there were alot
of Maintenance men on the top 50 floors around those days.
Ok then, Somebody please try and answer this one then......
If these fires were so big and hot (melt steel), How did they manage to find the terrorists passport?
Are they fire proof?
1. Are you sure they found their passports?
2. Who says they were actually carrying them?
3. Is it possible that their passports were ejected with a lot of other aircraft debris at point of impact?
Leave a comment: