- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: We'll all pull together
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "We'll all pull together"
Collapse
-
so they weren't stopped before they even got started by the ice that was not supposed to be there ?
meanwhile, climate scientists try to weasel their way out of their crappy predictions on ice
maybe it's natural variability - send more money quick
-
From the kyak trip website :-
Strange weather has defined the year we are told. It’s been colder than usual and the ice has been very slow in going out. Climate change critics may quickly point this out as a damning argument but the reality of climate change is not reflected in specific anomaly but rather in overall trend.
Oh, and the price increases to reduce emissions are tiny compared to the fluctuations in energy costs due to our reliance on fossil fuel and the implicit geopolitics and resource constraints, for example in the three years to 2006, the wholesale gas price rose from 20p a therm to 70p – an increase of 350%. Green measures are insignificant by comparison.
Oh and 'catastrophic' AGW is an emotive and unscientific straw man. You won't find the word anywhere in the IPCC reports.
Leave a comment:
-
How about growing, on a massive scale, many square miles of seaweed floating on the sea in tropical locations. I bet it'll grow real quick, then it can be dried, cut up into fine powder, and burned like coal.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by rl4engc View PostOnly whilst we're in the grip of the big oil companies and energy producers (which granted could be a while more yet) but I can see a day where people power their homes from solar cells all over their house and garden, and power their cars from some kind of scalable algae-to-ethanol-contraption they made from freely available bits off ebay.
I think that's one particular cat that won't be able to stay in a bag of any Govt/BigCos making.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Troll View PostCan only get worse
I think that's one particular cat that won't be able to stay in a bag of any Govt/BigCos making.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by EternalOptimist View PostCatastrophic anthropomorphic global warming. aka alarmism
Loaded it all in to a SQL Database and knocked up some SSRS reports, expecting there to be a marked rise in temparatures, and huge increase in rainfall what with all this "Extreme Weather" the news and politicians would have you believe. I even added 12/60 month SMA's, graphs to compare by decade (i.e. 40's v 50's v 70's v 80's v 90's etc)
The results? It looked like white noise. A slight drifting up of temperatures (SMA60 i.e. 5 years) from about 1987 to 2007, but it's been tailing off ever since, and the SMA60 average temp is about the same now as it's been in (checks graphs..) 1991, 1961, 1949.
Point is, I'm not a Climate Scientist but I can and do turn raw data into human readable form, and to anyone's eye there is no ramping up in temperatures over the last 100 or so years. Not even a blip during 39-45 when a lot of CO2 would have been produced.
I recycle and don't like waste as much as the next man but completely disagree with this 'taxing everything and using the CO2 card' bulltulip.Last edited by rl4engc; 16 July 2013, 11:18.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Postheh heh
Catastrophic anthropomorphic global warming. aka alarmism
it's what is putting £100 on everyones energy bill right now, which is why it is no joke. It's distorting energy policy in a grotesque way. plus getting blisters on some rowers hands
Can only get worse
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by KentPhilip View Post
BTW to EO, the OP, CAGW stands for: Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming
correct
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
BTW to EO, the OP, CAGW stands for: Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
Catastrophic anthropomorphic global warming. aka alarmism
it's what is putting £100 on everyones energy bill right now, which is why it is no joke. It's distorting energy policy in a grotesque way. plus getting blisters on some rowers hands
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by EternalOptimist View PostFour rowers decided to row the Northwest passage to show the devastating effect of CAGW on the ice. The BBC etc had said that the arctic could be ice free in the summer by 2013.
They didn't get far before they were stopped by the ice
The reason for all the ice ? CAGW has made it a lot colder and has caused a large ice anomaly
So if they get through the NWP, it proves CAGW, and if they cant even get started it proves CAGW
There is some serious doublethink going on in these alarmists heads.
ten out of ten for effort and ten out of ten for a good adventure though
the route is not ready for you
Leave a comment:
-
We'll all pull together
Four rowers decided to row the Northwest passage to show the devastating effect of CAGW on the ice. The BBC etc had said that the arctic could be ice free in the summer by 2013.
They didn't get far before they were stopped by the ice
The reason for all the ice ? CAGW has made it a lot colder and has caused a large ice anomaly
So if they get through the NWP, it proves CAGW, and if they cant even get started it proves CAGW
There is some serious doublethink going on in these alarmists heads.
ten out of ten for effort and ten out of ten for a good adventure though
the route is not ready for youLast edited by EternalOptimist; 16 July 2013, 09:47.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Today 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
- Why limited company working could be back in vogue in 2025 Dec 16 09:45
Leave a comment: