Reply to: Suggestion to board admins

[The Lone Gunman]

So who's Zeitghost then?

Zeitghost doesnt exist, he is a figment of our collective imagination caused by lack of alcohol. That is why nobody ever remembers to include him in their lists.

[Spartacus]

We always suspected as much.

I'm Spartacus.

So who's Zeitghost then? Is it the Cyber Controller?

[Andyw]

Most definately write.

Right, not write !

[Dundeegeorge]

Alright, I'll come clean

I admit that I also sign in and post as AtW, Snaw and Sasguru.
Moderators, please delete those accounts immediately, I apologise if I've caused anyone any embarrassment.

[expat]

Ban all nicknames that access the site from the same IP address....

Yes, but why?

[Spartacus]

I would use AtW....he's been here far too long.

I am AtW.

[NickIT]

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

This was in the first post at the start of the thread.

Yeah...which is good enough for me

[Phoenix]

I would use AtW....he's been here far too long.

[Dundeegeorge]

Excuse me for asking

but what is the big deal with people having multiple Id's anyway?
Why is Alexei so upset by this? Is he suffering from schizophrenia and wants to punish himself?

Now there's a thought.
If you could choose to post under someone else's ID, which ID would you choose and why?

[Phoenix]

You have been here far longer than I

[Fleetwood]

Just ******* ban everyone, close down this miserable site and tell everyone to piss off and get a life.

HTH

Sound advice, DP.

[AtW]

Those who use AOL (who employ proxies) will get exactly what they deserve.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

This was in the first post at the start of the thread.

[NickIT]

His numbers are certainly incorrect - 10% of 500 is 50, and there are less than that many posters on here.

Those multi-nickname spammers are easy to track - their pattern of usage of this site is very different, they would login and post, then login under different nickname - correlate this with datestamps of posts and it will be obvious that different people will never login sequentially in such a short time from same IP, meaning ban all such nicks and IP.

AOL.

[Phoenix]

His numbers are certainly incorrect - 10% of 500 is 50, and there are less than that many posters on here.

Those multi-nickname spammers are easy to track - their pattern of usage of this site is very different, they would login and post, then login under different nickname - correlate this with datestamps of posts and it will be obvious that different people will never login sequentially in such a short time from same IP, meaning ban all such nicks and IP.

Do you get off on this jackboot stomping around, I am never wrong attitude....or are you genuinely enjoying this thread?

[AtW]

Err I refer the learned gentleman to exibit A (above)

His numbers are certainly incorrect - 10% of 500 is 50, and there are less than that many posters on here.

Those multi-nickname spammers are easy to track - their pattern of usage of this site is very different, they would login and post, then login under different nickname - correlate this with datestamps of posts and it will be obvious that different people will never login sequentially in such a short time from same IP, meaning ban all such nicks and IP.