• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "It's alright lads he's sorry"

Collapse

  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by TheMonkey
    I'll solve that. Every prisoner should be stuck into a queue about 6 people long based on the severity of their crime. If they run out of space on the queue, then the person at the top (most severe) should be executed.
    In one country they decided to crack down on rapes, so they made it capital offence and were executing those convited. Guess what? Women who were unfortunate to get raped started getting killed, because it made no difference in terms of sentence - both death, so rapists figured they are better off not leaving alive witnesses.

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    1: You should only use the justice system to ensure the guilty culprit is correctly identified

    2: Once the system has administered the slap on the wrist then you should enact your own ‘natural justice' as the aggrieved party

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by TheMonkey
    I'll solve that. Every prisoner should be stuck into a queue about 6 people long based on the severity of their crime. If they run out of space on the queue, then the person at the top (most severe) should be executed.
    Sounds good. Also, automatic execution for the second offence.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrsGoof
    replied
    Originally posted by John Galt
    Another brilliant NL plan

    First offenders can be let off if they say sorry to their victims. According to the article it will be a very difficult thing for them to do and it is therefore not going soft on crime. Now, let me see - fine, community, prison or 'Sorry mate'.... I wonder....
    My dad was beaten up about 18 months ago by two guys. The police caught one based upon DNA and the fact he wan't bright enough to run far enough away, as he left blood all over the window frames he put his bare hands through.

    All the way through the case he denied the incident (2 * GBH (coppers) 1* ABH (dad) and 2 * criminal damage).

    When he came to cour he turned up in a nice designer suite, fresh white teeth and a big sorry sir won't happen again.

    He was given 100 hours of Comunity sevice and supervision order, but still on the street. Plue 2 £100 fines, one for my dad and one for the people who owned the house he wrecked, despite the total cost of repair was £3,500.

    A month after the case my dad recieved a letter from a Probation officer type person (PO) saying that he wanted to meet my dad to say "SORRY", he was clearly nervous of this, so I phone the PO to see what this was all about. THe PO told me that it was part of this guy rehab to say sorry. I asked her "Did he volunteer to do this?". "No, he was told to, so he could REDUCE his punishment".

    FFS

    Mel Smith and the Not the 9 oclick new team had it right "OFF WITH THEIR GOOLIES"

    Leave a comment:


  • NickIT
    replied
    Originally posted by ladymuck
    But a lot of trials drag on for years over minor technicalities costing the taxpaper millions in the process. TheMonkey's idea will save a lot of mazooma that can be spent on fitting air-con and comfy sofas in all the prisons.
    Or even our own independent nuclear deterent if the Americans let us....

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    Originally posted by NickIT
    Bit of a problem executing people before they've had a trial!
    But a lot of trials drag on for years over minor technicalities costing the taxpaper millions in the process. TheMonkey's idea will save a lot of mazooma that can be spent on fitting air-con and comfy sofas in all the prisons.

    Leave a comment:


  • NickIT
    replied
    Originally posted by TheMonkey
    I'll solve that. Every prisoner should be stuck into a queue about 6 people long based on the severity of their crime. If they run out of space on the queue, then the person at the top (most severe) should be executed.
    Bit of a problem executing people before they've had a trial!

    Leave a comment:


  • TheMonkey
    replied
    Originally posted by NickIT
    From what I understand our prisons are at capacity.

    I wonder what the breakdown is between -

    Remand

    First Time Offenders

    Recidivists
    I'll solve that. Every prisoner should be stuck into a queue about 6 people long based on the severity of their crime. If they run out of space on the queue, then the person at the top (most severe) should be executed.

    Leave a comment:


  • NickIT
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW
    If offence is small then its reasonable so long as its done for the FIRST time offenders only, its those who commit lots of crimes are the problem and should be put firmly behind bars, something that would be possible if first time offenders are not exposed to experienced criminals who would ensure that first timers will come back for more.
    From what I understand our prisons are at capacity.

    I wonder what the breakdown is between -

    Remand

    First Time Offenders

    Recidivists

    Leave a comment:


  • wonderwaif
    replied
    I agree we don't want to expose first-timers to hardened crims, that's why I go for the electrical charge to the gonads option.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    If offence is small then its reasonable so long as its done for the FIRST time offenders only, its those who commit lots of crimes are the problem and should be put firmly behind bars, something that would be possible if first time offenders are not exposed to experienced criminals who would ensure that first timers will come back for more.

    Leave a comment:


  • wonderwaif
    replied
    I don't want the perp to SAY sorry, I want him to BE sorry. A large electrical charge through the love spuds would do it I think.

    Leave a comment:


  • John Galt
    started a topic It's alright lads he's sorry

    It's alright lads he's sorry

    Another brilliant NL plan

    First offenders can be let off if they say sorry to their victims. According to the article it will be a very difficult thing for them to do and it is therefore not going soft on crime. Now, let me see - fine, community, prison or 'Sorry mate'.... I wonder....
Working...
X