• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Eekonomists

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Eekonomists"

Collapse

  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Each leg last about 20 years, so we've got about 15 years left on the bust, then the boom will begin. So expect to be rich in about 35 years time.

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    No not at all. If you ride a couple of booms, avoid losing it in the bust, you can, as you say, go from humble beginnings to relative wealth.

    Oh, and don't get divorced.
    So when is the next boom? It just feels like buuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuust.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    You say that like it's a bad thing.
    Without the housing boom of the 90s-00s I wouldn't have become prosperous.
    And it was open to anyone.
    People slag off Labour but your best chance of getting rich was during their term of office
    No not at all. If you ride a couple of booms, avoid losing it in the bust, you can, as you say, go from humble beginnings to relative wealth.

    Oh, and don't get divorced.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    3. Engineer booms .
    You say that like it's a bad thing.
    Without the housing boom of the 90s-00s I wouldn't have become prosperous.
    And it was open to anyone.
    People slag off Labour but your best chance of getting rich was during their term of office

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by suityou01 View Post
    So the only way to win is to become one of the elite? How does one go about doing this
    For someone of your calibre?

    Euro lottery.

    Leave a comment:


  • pjclarke
    replied
    In developed countries, tax reforms typically included: scaling back the progressive tax rates on personal income, particularly marginal rates at the top end of the income scale; reducing the number of income tax brackets; cutting back corporate tax rates; broadening the income tax base by eliminating loopholes and exemptions; and increasing rates of indirect taxes – in particular the value-added tax (VAT) – and social security contributions (Sandford, 1993: 10–20).

    The changes in the tax structure, allegedly aimed at making the tax system more “neutral”, favoured some interests over others. The elimination of loopholes and exemptions in most cases reduced certain privileges of taxpayers in the higher income groups. At the same time, cuts in income and capital taxation, together with increases in consumption taxes, led to a redistribution of the tax burden which fell more heavily on lower income groups. The overall effect of these changes in the tax structure made taxation more regressive. Indeed, a review of tax reforms in OECD countries did not find a single country where the tax system became more progressive (Steinmo, 2003: 223).
    UN TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT REPORT, 2012

    http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/tdr2012_en.pdf

    Which leads to

    Billionaires Worth $1.9 Trillion Seek Advantage in 2013 - Bloomberg

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    So the only way to win is to become one of the elite? How does one go about doing this

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by suityou01 View Post
    So we democratically elect a government that has no power and is ruled by the unelected bankers, thus making a mockery of the democratic election process?
    Well, regardless of who you "democratically" elect, they will:

    1. Bail out the (casino) banks regardless of moral hazard.
    2. Prop up property prices to breaking point, ensuring said banks receive maximum income from interest charges.
    3. Engineer booms (privatise profit making for the elite), and busts (nationalise losses for the masses).

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    So we democratically elect a government that has no power and is ruled by the unelected bankers, thus making a mockery of the democratic election process?

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    Quite. "Financial Analysis" is a case in point. About as good as astrology.
    I've found this to be the best approach.

    Profitable Stock Trading using Moon Cycles - Lunar Cycle Trading

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by LGDT View Post
    You’d drive yourself bonkers if you tried to time your market moves based on self-appointed gurus.

    The question you have to ask yourself is if these guys are so good then why are they spamming you with offers to buy into their expertise instead of sipping Mojitos, perched on their piles of cash in their beachside mansions?

    After 27 years of investing and having seen about 7 world-ending crises I am tempted to back my own judgement and leave the prophets of doom and fill yer boots merchants to argue amongst themselves.
    Quite. "Financial Analysis" is a case in point. About as good as astrology.

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Yeah, they put a website to draw people's attention to it.



    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothsc...iracy_theories
    Any links that aren't conspiracy theories, I've run out of tinfoil.

    Leave a comment:


  • LGDT
    replied
    You’d drive yourself bonkers if you tried to time your market moves based on self-appointed gurus.

    The question you have to ask yourself is if these guys are so good then why are they spamming you with offers to buy into their expertise instead of sipping Mojitos, perched on their piles of cash in their beachside mansions?

    After 27 years of investing and having seen about 7 world-ending crises I am tempted to back my own judgement and leave the prophets of doom and fill yer boots merchants to argue amongst themselves.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by suityou01 View Post
    Linky?
    Yeah, they put a website to draw people's attention to it.



    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothsc...iracy_theories

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    When you realise the banking elite regulate the govt, it all makes sense.
    Linky?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X