• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Moore's law

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Moore's law"

Collapse

  • yasockie
    replied
    You will be able to get 2x more transistors on the the same die/soc in 2 years time still, but it won't be twice as fast for you - there isn't an easy way to parallelise many of the workloads...

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    I generally agree with Brian Moore on the matter of scrummaging and the straight put in, yes, but unfortunately his law is rather shoddily applied by southern referees.

    Leave a comment:


  • alreadypacked
    started a topic Moore's law

    Moore's law

    Does it still apply?



    Moore's law - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Working...
X