• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "UAC - What's the point?"

Collapse

  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    Wow is this a serious thread or a Mick take. If it's serious then there are some extremely stupid people here.
    Well we are talking windows devs...

    Leave a comment:


  • woohoo
    replied
    Wow is this a serious thread or a Mick take. If it's serious then there are some extremely stupid people here.

    Leave a comment:


  • stek
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    I don't have this problem.
    Me neither, Microsoft not ready for the enterprise is it?

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    I don't have this problem.

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by rl4engc View Post
    But I'm executing M$ signed code, so it adds no value whatsoever. If anything makes me want to turn UAC off because if I'm confronted by 30 or 40 warnings like that in the course of a normal day, chances are if I ever did accidentally click on some malicious icon (highly unlikely) I'd automatically click on 'Continue' as I'd be so used to doing it.

    Bit like how noone bats an eyelid when a car alarm goes off.
    So signed code should have full access to your system without any warning? Obvious problem there.

    I only really see it when I run installers, or when I launch regedit, which because of what I do does happen quite often. Not 40 times a day though, and for most users who aren't developers, it's going to be a rare occurrence.

    At least Windows doesn't demand you type in an administrator password, again, and again, and again...

    Leave a comment:


  • rl4engc
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    To alert people to the fact that privilege elevation is occurring. Otherwise malicious code could just "go admin" and you wouldn't know.
    But I'm executing M$ signed code, so it adds no value whatsoever. If anything makes me want to turn UAC off because if I'm confronted by 30 or 40 warnings like that in the course of a normal day, chances are if I ever did accidentally click on some malicious icon (highly unlikely) I'd automatically click on 'Continue' as I'd be so used to doing it.

    Bit like how noone bats an eyelid when a car alarm goes off.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by rl4engc View Post
    What's the point in this scenario though:
    1. Be a member of local admins group
    2. Be launching some program or control panel snap in or whatever
    3. "You need to be a member of the local admins, or supply credentials with local admin to complete this action."
    4. Be clicking on the 'Continue' button with the security shield
    5. Be presented with the screen I intended to arrive at in step (2)

    WTF is the point in steps 3) and 4) ?
    To alert people to the fact that privilege elevation is occurring. Otherwise malicious code could just "go admin" and you wouldn't know.

    Leave a comment:


  • rl4engc
    replied
    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post

    If you need to run something as administrator all the time (which you shouldn't really), change its shortcut. It's not hard.
    What's the point in this scenario though:
    1. Be a member of local admins group
    2. Be launching some program or control panel snap in or whatever
    3. "You need to be a member of the local admins, or supply credentials with local admin to complete this action."
    4. Be clicking on the 'Continue' button with the security shield
    5. Be presented with the screen I intended to arrive at in step (2)

    WTF is the point in steps 3) and 4) ?

    Leave a comment:


  • zoco
    replied
    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post

    If you need to run something as administrator all the time (which you shouldn't really), change its shortcut. It's not hard.
    Well, I can't attach a debugger to an IIS process unless I'm running as adminstrator so I don't really have a lot of choice.

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    For a long time people went on and on about how much better the security was in Linux and MacOS and was crap in Windows XP. So Microsoft put in the same sort of security into Vista, and people moaned that it was now harder to do insecure things.

    If you need to run something as administrator all the time (which you shouldn't really), change its shortcut. It's not hard.

    Leave a comment:


  • stek
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    It the kind of concept that will never catch on...
    In Frances do they called it 'Fenetres'?

    And in Germany 'Vindows, ve haf bays of making you open..'?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by stek View Post
    I'm an IT Professional, I think I'd have heard of this 'Windows' - what is it?
    It the kind of concept that will never catch on...

    Leave a comment:


  • stek
    replied
    I'm an IT Professional, I think I'd have heard of this 'Windows' - what is it?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    It's the IQ test, just like in the Men in Black...

    Leave a comment:


  • zoco
    started a topic UAC - What's the point?

    UAC - What's the point?

    I have UAC on my laptop at home but I don't really use that in anger so up until now it hasn't really given me any woes. I'm now working at a client where the environment is Windows 7 and UAC is enabled via a group policy - no way to get rid of it because each time you log on to your machine the pesky feature has been re-enabled.

    I can't begin to tell you how much hair I've pulled out over this. The classic one is forgetting to start an application via the "Run as Admin" shortcut. Visual Studio especially gives all kinds of misleading errors and I end up scratching my head for ages just to find out in the end that the problem was beacuase I didn't run it up as admin.

    Really, what is the point of this useless feature?
Working...
X