Originally posted by mudskipper
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Conjecture
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Conjecture"
Collapse
-
Or Grommitsome?Originally posted by Old Hack View Postlavendernorthbynortheast
Morphew
But spelt oddly - not going to type it as I'd rather she didn't stumble across this thread if she googles herself,
Leave a comment:
-
It was bad enough with both my first and surname in the UK, its even worse here
Leave a comment:
-
No it was a mixture of a plasticine figure and 'not very many'.Originally posted by SimonMac View PostWas her name a mixture of a flower and a point on the compass?
Leave a comment:
-
Was her name a mixture of a flower and a point on the compass?Originally posted by mudskipper View PostWhen I was trying to find a childminder, I rang everyone on the list before the minder I ended up with, because I wasn't sure how to pronounce her name. If anyone else had vacancies, she wouldn't have got my business. Maybe that's why she did have vacancies. (She turned out to be an excellent minder despite her odd name!)
Leave a comment:
-
If I had a quid for every time I have had to spell my surname, I wouldn't be working.
Leave a comment:
-
When I was trying to find a childminder, I rang everyone on the list before the minder I ended up with, because I wasn't sure how to pronounce her name. If anyone else had vacancies, she wouldn't have got my business. Maybe that's why she did have vacancies. (She turned out to be an excellent minder despite her odd name!)
Leave a comment:
-
I have told people how to spell my name and they have got it wrong.Originally posted by Dominic Connor View PostI think it's the other way round, unless you see awkward names as some sort of proxy for racism.
Actually for most of my life I guess 1/3 of people manage to say my name wrong which is impressive, but not in a good way.
Leave a comment:
-
Don't think so
I think it's the other way round, unless you see awkward names as some sort of proxy for racism.
Actually for most of my life I guess 1/3 of people manage to say my name wrong which is impressive, but not in a good way.
Leave a comment:
-
Conjecture
People with long hardly-pronounceable names look for jobs longer.
WDYT?Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Today 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Yesterday 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37
- Simple Assessment letters: How ex-Personal Service Companies are on HMRC’s radar Sep 11 12:16
- HMRC leaves 37,000 contractors’ nil-liability question in the air Sep 11 07:42
- Pay 2% to protect a ‘loan’. Settle it for 1–2%? The contractor debt mystery deepens Sep 10 06:30
- Napkin, anyone, for your next IT contract? Sep 9 06:11
- 52 contractors told us what they think of Andy Burnham. Basically: not much, yet. Sep 8 06:02

Leave a comment: