• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Contracting and outsourcing"

Collapse

  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by Francko
    No, that remark wasn't for you. But I can make a even better one now.
    The reason why you are making this statement ("Knowing both sides, I can see that the management side is infinitely more difficult") has only one explanation. You are not qualified for the role you are filling in now. Just as an unqualified programmer would find a compiler to be chaotic and illogical, you do find this in your role. The reason is simple. Many business managers come to their position without any qualification, any proper study or any self-learning activity. True, it's difficult to find qualified business people. Example, how many project managers do know rup, prince2, cobit, itil (and I mean properly know, not just mentioning it on the cv) and have studied all their alternative, educating themselves everyday just like a good techie does. Answer: very few (the good ones). Most of them believe that improvisation is good enough, and are backed up by even more incompetent senior managers. It's not like that. Ffs, even comedians do not improvise but they follow strict mathematical rules. Sure, you will need a creative input but that's just as useful as is for a programmer.
    Spoken like a true techie. Things rarely have "one explanation".
    Stop wasting your time with stuff that you don't understand, techie boy.
    Keep coding - until your code monkey skills are outsourced to Vikram in Bangalore.

    Leave a comment:


  • Emperor Dalek
    replied
    Outsource to Skaro, you know it makes sense. No problems with uppity staff plus my positronic brain alone could process your entire planet's financial transations in less than 1 millisecond.

    Leave a comment:


  • Francko
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru
    I'm assuming your first sentence isn't aimed at me - my technical knowledge in my speciality is second to none, particularly as I was doing it for 15 years, mostly as a contractor, till I took my permie management job.
    Knowing both sides, I can see that the management side is infinitely more difficult, as it involves dealing with people who, as a species, are chaotic and illogical. On the other hand techies can be stubborn, ignorant of the bigger picture and inflexible and those ones totally deserve their outsourced fate.
    No, that remark wasn't for you. But I can make a even better one now.
    The reason why you are making this statement ("Knowing both sides, I can see that the management side is infinitely more difficult") has only one explanation. You are not qualified for the role you are filling in now. Just as an unqualified programmer would find a compiler to be chaotic and illogical, you do find this in your role. The reason is simple. Many business managers come to their position without any qualification, any proper study or any self-learning activity. True, it's difficult to find qualified business people. Example, how many project managers do know rup, prince2, cobit, itil (and I mean properly know, not just mentioning it on the cv) and have studied all their alternative, educating themselves everyday just like a good techie does. Answer: very few (the good ones). Most of them believe that improvisation is good enough, and are backed up by even more incompetent senior managers. It's not like that. Ffs, even comedians do not improvise but they follow strict mathematical rules. Sure, you will need a creative input but that's just as useful as is for a programmer.

    Leave a comment:


  • Francko
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru
    Spot on. It's not an accident that Francko has picked a monkey as his avatar.
    He represents a lower link in the evolution of IT.
    Monkeys are the ultimate evolution of IT. Or are you aiming to be a dalek instead? In that case, prepare to be exterminated.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by hyperD
    Yes, the number of times I've heard people say "that freelancer is shit because he doesn't understand the logic behind recursive programming" etc and yet that freelancer takes the client out for a drink, sits in meetings and helps the client out with project decisions and options, talks to the client about mundane subjects without arse licking, is sensitive to the political situation within the client's office, befriends the perms and offers free technical advice to the project without being secretive, speaks highly of the perms even if they are not to their tech standards, ...

    ...and ultimately gets additional contracts, normally without an agent buggering things up between that relationship...

    It's the difference between "contract/temp" and defining a business/service...
    Spot on. It's not an accident that Francko has picked a monkey as his avatar.
    He represents a lower link in the evolution of IT.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by Francko
    True but just because your technical knowledge is a joke doesn't make you good at other skills. The good techies are probably also good at business analysis and management, but many of them are just not interested. The bad techies will be poor as managers too but they are interested since they can mask their incompetencies more than what they could do as techies.
    I'm assuming your first sentence isn't aimed at me - my technical knowledge in my speciality is second to none, particularly as I was doing it for 15 years, mostly as a contractor, till I took my permie management job.
    Knowing both sides, I can see that the management side is infinitely more difficult, as it involves dealing with people who, as a species, are chaotic and illogical. On the other hand techies can be stubborn, ignorant of the bigger picture and inflexible and those ones totally deserve their outsourced fate.

    Leave a comment:


  • hyperD
    replied
    Yes, the number of times I've heard people say "that freelancer is shit because he doesn't understand the logic behind recursive programming" etc and yet that freelancer takes the client out for a drink, sits in meetings and helps the client out with project decisions and options, talks to the client about mundane subjects without arse licking, is sensitive to the political situation within the client's office, befriends the perms and offers free technical advice to the project without being secretive, speaks highly of the perms even if they are not to their tech standards, ...

    ...and ultimately gets additional contracts, normally without an agent buggering things up between that relationship...

    It's the difference between "contract/temp" and defining a business/service...

    Leave a comment:


  • Francko
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru
    The added value is usually the intangible stuff that techies are so poor at - political skills, business analysis, engagement management, client service.
    True but just because your technical knowledge is a joke doesn't make you good at other skills. The good techies are probably also good at business analysis and management, but many of them are just not interested. The bad techies will be poor as managers too but they are interested since they can mask their incompetencies more than what they could do as techies.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by Francko
    Is contracting going to disappear by 2011 due to the large outsourcing of IT infrastructure and development? What daleks' supercomputer is forecasting about that?
    Whatever can be commoditised will be. The question to ask yourself is "What added value am I contributing that can't be contributed by someone on the other side of the world?". If the answer is nothing, then you have your answer.
    The added value is usually the intangible stuff that techies are so poor at - political skills, business analysis, engagement management, client service.

    Leave a comment:


  • snaw
    replied
    Originally posted by Francko
    Is contracting going to disappear by 2011 due to the large outsourcing of IT infrastructure and development? What daleks' supercomputer is forecasting about that?
    Is there a trend for more outsourcing of infrastructure? I've seen more companies do the reverse recently but that's just in my limited worldview. Dunno the bigger picture trends.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    By 2011 all jobs of value will have gone abroad.

    House ownership will be impossible.

    New Lie will issue everyone with food parcels to stay alive.

    HTH

    Leave a comment:


  • Francko
    started a topic Contracting and outsourcing

    Contracting and outsourcing

    Is contracting going to disappear by 2011 due to the large outsourcing of IT infrastructure and development? What daleks' supercomputer is forecasting about that?

Working...
X