Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Classic. I've been asked to go to an audit committee with the exectuve sponsor to justify the rather expensive internal development project I'm now in charge of which had already failed twice last year before it was passed to me.
The committee want to know the reasons for the project. What improvements it will make? What manual processes it replaces? What are the cost savings? What is the ROI? Why is it taking so long?
Before the project started I recommended buying in another product that did everything plus more than we wanted. It was half the price & I recommended that I thought the present project was unachieveable on the platform they wanted and they really needed a replacement. I was told that, that was out of the question & the entire team was instructed to go ahead as they'd already tried twice and spent a lot of money.
I'm now expected to go and justify it? What should I say?
I have been instructed to justify it. I'm thinking I may just calculate the cost savings to less than buying the product & then look confusedly at the sponsor.
Just give 'em the figures. Add a contingency where the permies have to work a 24 hour day to (possibly) make it happen. Waffle on about risking staff retention, associated expense etc
Or is it possible to lamp someone and run for it?
I have been instructed to justify it. I'm thinking I may just calculate the cost savings to less than buying the product & then look confusedly at the sponsor.
**** it, go contracting again. Too much of that management wank is bad for your health.
Tell them to can it and buy the package you recommended.
I have been instructed to justify it. I'm thinking I may just calculate the cost savings to less than buying the product & then look confusedly at the sponsor.
Classic. I've been asked to go to an audit committee with the exectuve sponsor to justify the rather expensive internal development project I'm now in charge of which had already failed twice last year before it was passed to me.
The committee want to know the reasons for the project. What improvements it will make? What manual processes it replaces? What are the cost savings? What is the ROI? Why is it taking so long?
Before the project started I recommended buying in another product that did everything plus more than we wanted. It was half the price & I recommended that I thought the present project was unachieveable on the platform they wanted and they really needed a replacement. I was told that, that was out of the question & the entire team was instructed to go ahead as they'd already tried twice and spent a lot of money.
I'm now expected to go and justify it? What should I say?
Leave a comment: