Both above comments are true: in an idealistic world the free market would dictate a natural market rate for value and quality, but unfortunately we have a state distorted corporatocracy and an overtly large and unaccountable public sector.
As sasguru has stated before, there's no black and white in these situations.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: The British oligarchy
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "The British oligarchy"
Collapse
-
Why not a cap of 100k, maybe 200k on the salaries of everybody who hasn't risked a large chunk of his own money on a business? Political spivs or private sector spivs; no difference. They're all spivs. On the other hand, people who've built a business from nothing, or people who've built the family business and risked their inheritance while doing so have gained my admiration. I'd make an exception for professional athletes who live in the public gaze and can´t make a mistake without millions of people seeing it, but frankly, multi-million pound salaries for sitting in a boardroom playing monopoly with someone else's money; bollocks, that isn't skilled and it's pretty low risk and there are thousands of business graduates coming out of Europe's polys every year who could do the job.Originally posted by sasguru View PostIt's all part of the same thing. If you have a talent for politics (and that's the only talent you need) get into some large bureaucracy (public sector or private sector) and get to the top where you can award you and your cronies disproportionate compensation. In the private sector your shareholders can't get you out usually till you run the ocmpany into the ground and leave with a golden goodbye and in the public sector you can fleece the taxpayer by paying yourslf a salary greater than the Prime Minsister for running basically somehting that could run itself.
It's not a left or right issue.
And the justification they use is: that's the market rate. Well course it is, you've all voted yourself a ginormous salary, course its going to be the market rate. A spivocracy has emerged.
We should start with the public sector since that is what most of us are paying for. A cap of £100K on all public sector salaries would be a start. What's the betting that services would be about the same?Last edited by Mich the Tester; 7 April 2013, 10:31.
Leave a comment:
-
It's all part of the same thing. If you have a talent for politics (and that's the only talent you need) get into some large bureaucracy (public sector or private sector) and get to the top where you can award you and your cronies disproportionate compensation. In the private sector your shareholders can't get you out usually till you run the ocmpany into the ground and leave with a golden goodbye and in the public sector you can fleece the taxpayer by paying yourslf a salary greater than the Prime Minsister for running basically somehting that could run itself.Originally posted by darmstadt View PostHere's some weekend reading for you: http://www.taxpayersalliance.com/thrl2012.pdf
It's not a left or right issue.
And the justification they use is: that's the market rate. Well course it is, you've all voted yourself a ginormous salary, course its going to be the market rate. A spivocracy has emerged.
We should start with the public sector since that is what most of us are paying for. A cap of £100K on all public sector salaries would be a start. What's the betting that services would be about the same?Last edited by sasguru; 5 April 2013, 16:53.
Leave a comment:
-
Here's some weekend reading for you: http://www.taxpayersalliance.com/thrl2012.pdfOriginally posted by DodgyAgent View PostAnd lets not forget the "I joined the labour to make a difference" set:
Labour-run town halls give executives £432,000 pay-offs - Telegraph
Leave a comment:
-
What excuses am I making? I'm merely observing that having a self-serving talentless oligarchy creaming off millions is only giving ammunition to the lefties.Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostI am a capitalist and you are making excuses.
But you're a cretin so you don't get it.
Leave a comment:
-
Indeed. Very profitable heresy by the looks of it.Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostThat's heresy
Leave a comment:
-
We could formulate a plan to destroy it from within! Maw ha ha haaaaOriginally posted by Mich the Tester View PostYou could join the Labour party too you know.
Leave a comment:
-
That's heresyOriginally posted by Mich the Tester View PostYou could join the Labour party too you know.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by sasguru View PostOf course they're richer than me, since they're part of an unmeritocratic oligarchy, you imbecile.
I thought you were a capitalist?
I am a capitalist and you are making excuses.
What are you? A "loserist"?
Leave a comment:
-
You could join the Labour party too you know.Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostAnd lets not forget the "I joined the labour to make a difference" set:
Labour-run town halls give executives £432,000 pay-offs - Telegraph
Leave a comment:
-
And lets not forget the "I joined the labour to make a difference" set:
Labour-run town halls give executives £432,000 pay-offs - Telegraph
Leave a comment:
-
you're prostrate or your prostate.Originally posted by sasguru View PostQuite, you doddery, senile, old fart. Now off you toddle, nurse wants to check your prostrate.
Either fits
Leave a comment:
-
Of course they're richer than me, since they're part of an unmeritocratic oligarchy, you imbecile.Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostThey are richer than you are despite having crap degrees
I suppose they could have done a computer science degree like yours
and become a complete loser like you. 
I thought you were a capitalist?
Leave a comment:
-
E's got a heart of gold. Do you know he sends flowers to his mum every week. He's alright by meOriginally posted by Mich the Tester View PostAn agent sticking up for a bookie. Surpise, suprise.

Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Leave a comment: