• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: A radical policy?

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "A radical policy?"

Collapse

  • Ignis Fatuus
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    Bolded item implemented by the French recently. Didn't work for them.
    Didn't it? what do you mean by "didn't work for them"?

    The French view (fron the INSEE) is that it did work, though not as much as the ex ante analyses had suggested: it did create 350,000 jobs (which was the main point of the French exercise):

    le processus de RTT a conduit, selon les estimations, à un rapide enrichissement de la croissance en emplois de près de 350 000 postes sur la période 1998-2002, et ceci, sans déséquilibre financier apparent pour les entreprises.
    -- Les effets de la RTT sur l’emploi


    Implemented piecemeal by the Dutch, AIUI more with a view to better work/life balance rather than job creation. Worked for them.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ignis Fatuus
    replied
    Originally posted by LatteLiberal View Post
    No they all have been implemented and found not to have worked (except the HOL).
    You're joking, right? (OK, this is General) Do you mean what you said to be a statement of fact?

    Reduction in working hours: what makes you say that it has been tried and found not to have worked? I draw your attention to the famous case of Henry Ford (no pinko liberal he) who cut his workers' working hours in order to have them work more efficiently and make more profit for him; and found that it worked.

    Free education: harder to give an acid test of whether it "worked" or not, but I maintain that it does make our country a better place. Feel free to argue otherwise. (not the same as "we can't/don't want to afford to send 50% of young people to university")

    Electoral reform: facile to say merely that it has worked - more than that, it was essential for a civilised society, but more is still needed. Cameron would have got it too, if he hadn't shafted the Libs on HOL reform.

    Decent provision for old age: again, a mark of a civilised society. It clearly has worked, the reforms in care for the aged after a lifetime of work have kept generations from ending there days in the poorhouse. But it is still shameful how some people suffer at their most vulnerable age.


    No: all have been tried, and all have been successful; but none is complete yet.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by Ignis Fatuus View Post
    Reduction in working hours
    Free education
    Electoral reform
    Reform or abolition of the House of Lords
    Decent provision for old age.

    Sounds good to me.

    These were all proposed by Gladstone in December 1891. Some of them are taking some time to implement.
    Bolded item implemented by the French recently. Didn't work for them.

    Leave a comment:


  • LatteLiberal
    replied
    Originally posted by Ignis Fatuus View Post
    Reduction in working hours
    Free education
    Electoral reform
    Reform or abolition of the House of Lords
    Decent provision for old age.

    Sounds good to me.

    These were all proposed by Gladstone in December 1891. Some of them are taking some time to implement.
    No they all have been implemented and found not to have worked (except the HOL).

    Leave a comment:


  • Ignis Fatuus
    started a topic A radical policy?

    A radical policy?

    Reduction in working hours
    Free education
    Electoral reform
    Reform or abolition of the House of Lords
    Decent provision for old age.

    Sounds good to me.

    These were all proposed by Gladstone in December 1891. Some of them are taking some time to implement.

Working...
X