• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Why why why?

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Why why why?"

Collapse

  • SimonMac
    replied
    Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
    If you manage people properly, set expectations properly and document properly all of these things work fantastically well.
    WHS (and that pains me to say)

    Problem is overview and accountability between off shore and in shore is usually too high a level where Bob just becomes a yes man to save face

    Leave a comment:


  • The Spartan
    replied
    I have worked with offshore teams before and have found that the savings made offshoring the work are often negated by the time it takes them to do things correctly.

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Originally posted by NotSaying View Post
    Why do people think it's a good idea to send things offshore to be built where testing team think testing the system works is beyond their remit. Like expecting developers to think or comunicate with each other is beyond their remit. As well as their BAs being able to provide specifications to the detail that their developers need.

    Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

    Seriously these people seem to think they are building something for fun, not that actually there are people who want to use this system and it actually has to function in the most basic end to end sense.

    Sorry had massive urge to vent. Feel better now.
    This is progress. Adapt or die

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    If you are fed up, go out to the titty bar across the road
    I've booked this instead for Thanks Giving

    THE US GRANT San Diego Hotel

    Maybe there is a titty bar across the road?

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
    You know nothing.

    I'm on my way back to the UK this weekend to do some planning. Back to the US in December then off to India to start hiring in Jan. Cost is important but it's access to resource that's more important. 4 out of my 5 new hires will be in India.
    If you are fed up, go out to the titty bar across the road

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    Such decisions have nothing to do with efficiency. The decision is made by some executive in order to show cost savings. His bonus is based on cost savings. Once he gets his bonus he will bugger off to the next company and he will be far away by the time the cost saving is found to be useless. The board will not admit that they made a mistake and the whole exercise will be claimed a success.


    IT these days has little to do with working efficiently and accurately. It is all to do with the pleasing the accountants, creating smoke screens to cover up inefficiencies and keeping the share price up.
    You know nothing.

    I'm on my way back to the UK this weekend to do some planning. Back to the US in December then off to India to start hiring in Jan. Cost is important but it's access to resource that's more important. 4 out of my 5 new hires will be in India.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotSaying
    replied
    "If you manage people properly, set expectations properly and document properly all of these things work fantastically well. "

    problem here is when you don't do the above...... not saying it's offshore's fault but why offshore if the project is not run in appropriate way to do so?

    anyway if I'd wanted a serious response I wouldn't have posted in general
    Last edited by NotSaying; 21 November 2012, 05:12. Reason: adding quote

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Such decisions have nothing to do with efficiency. The decision is made by some executive in order to show cost savings. His bonus is based on cost savings. Once he gets his bonus he will bugger off to the next company and he will be far away by the time the cost saving is found to be useless. The board will not admit that they made a mistake and the whole exercise will be claimed a success.

    IT these days has little to do with working efficiently and accurately. It is all to do with the pleasing the accountants, creating smoke screens to cover up inefficiencies and keeping the share price up.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    If you manage people properly, set expectations properly and document properly all of these things work fantastically well.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotSaying
    started a topic Why why why?

    Why why why?

    Why do people think it's a good idea to send things offshore to be built where testing team think testing the system works is beyond their remit. Like expecting developers to think or comunicate with each other is beyond their remit. As well as their BAs being able to provide specifications to the detail that their developers need.

    Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

    Seriously these people seem to think they are building something for fun, not that actually there are people who want to use this system and it actually has to function in the most basic end to end sense.

    Sorry had massive urge to vent. Feel better now.

Working...
X