Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Got out at 6:30, endless bob communications to them who were running the updation. "Can we stop the server now?" "Can we run the script now?" "Can restart the servers now?"
I do get pissed that they asked for all this information in a range of excel spreadsheeets and then get lost...
Got out at 6:30, endless bob communications to them who were running the updation. "Can we stop the server now?" "Can we run the script now?" "Can restart the servers now?"
I do get pissed that they asked for all this information in a range of excel spreadsheeets and then get lost...
The culmination of all our hard work and planning. Sitting here with a IM window scrolling past with all the infrastructure guys ticking things off the deployment schedule. All running to time.
Nice to get a win before I head to the bench.
Is this the first project to deliver on time in the history of IT?
Better yet I heard the ERP vendor sent a formal letter of compaint to Client Co blaming our project for their delays owing to insufficient data quality. I just pulled a document I wrote yonks ago, citing the agreed data deliverables, assumptions, caveats etc. It's getting all "law-suitish", but I think that document might just have blown the whole compaint out of the water.
All they way along I asked for acceptance criteria. They didn't provide, so I wrote my own and sent it to them for sign off in August. Clever suity.
Anyone else going live today? Quite a dos.
Suity good for you like
But what do you mean by the erp vendor ?
My son, in the world of erp this is only one vendor and like in highlander, there can be only one
and that is our very own .net
and if you refer to your erp vendor as the erp vendor then you're obviously not working with .net
and if you're not working with .net you're not working with erp
so rather say, your SME Management Information System vendor
Why if it has been properly tested and does not work is it the dev teams fault...
it should be pulled and re-tested correctly during working hours
Absolutely no chance I would spend more than an hour on the thing.
Absolutely no chance I would even bother to get into the who's fault game anyway. If it don't work it don't work, I never committed an assault on a member of staff.
There are very few testers who test 'properly'; most just carry out a set of instructions written acccording to some vacuous methodology and then piss off to the pub.
Leave a comment: