Due to the sort of cars I drive I found in the UK there were more than necessary jealous types that would try and have accidents with you.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Question for CarolB
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Question for CarolB"
Collapse
-
Guest repliedRe: time in jail
-
Guest repliedRe: time in jail
Forget the normative stuff like drink driving what about the emotive crap?
Anyone can kill someone in a car. A kid can run out into the road, and you can kill him at 20mph. The emphasis from the parents point of view will be to blame the driver, not the fact that he hasn't been taught the green cross code. I rmember readin an article in the paper about some group who had campaigned for speed bumps so that little johnny can play football in the road. Excuse me WTF is the road for?
All of a sudden the parents of RTA incidents become experts in road safety, "oh that road is so dangerous that killed our 17 yr old Johnny" (in his 140bhp Saxo) we must have speed bumps.
End of rant
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: time in jail
Driving a car without a licence, insurance, MOT etc, being involved in an accident due to careless wreckless or even dangerous driving should be offensive weapons offences.
What’s the point of banning someone who wasn’t allowed to drive in the first place?
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: time in jail
Forgot to mention: I always carry a disposable camera with me. Whenever there is an accident I take lots and lots of pictures. All around both cars, not just at the impact point.
Never ever ever mention to the plod you have photographic evidence, they will seize the camera and lose it (had that trick pulled on me as well).
And thanks in no small part to that I have an 80% no claims bonus and a clean driving license.
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: time in jail
I would expect that red jumpers and deliberate crashers would be much reduced if they faced an offensive weapons charge should they be found to be at fault.
This would no longer be under police control as it would no longer be regarded as a traffic offense.
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: time in jail
One of the reasons I got fed up of living in the UK was the plod doing stuff just like the above. It is really sickening. It is so much like several incidents I've had I can well believe it.
Due to the sort of cars I drive I found in the UK there were more than necessary jealous types that would try and have accidents with you.
And the plod always seem to back them up.
Tw4ts
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: time in jail
I would have fought it, but they he decided to pay for the course rather than risk points a fine or whatever.
I've heard of a couple of other cases where the police have been doing this threatening tactic to get people on their £300 courses.
AFAIR my friends only error was to assume no-one would be coming through the red light. The other driver disputed that he'd gone through the red but he was the only car to go through in a line of traffic. Unfortunately my friend assumed the other guy was going to play fair so didn't seek witnesses.
The police tried to do the other guy first but then just latched onto my friend who was less cunning.
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: time in jail
So did he hit the car jumping the red, or did the car jumping the red hit him? If the latter, this is just police harrasment. The conclusion of that train of thinking is that no one would go over a green light in case someone jumped the red coming the other way and drove into you.
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: time in jail
He's not the type to make things up. It's a road where people often jump the red. He was turning from a side road, the Police arguement was he should have seen the car jumping the lights.
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: time in jail
A friend (no not me) was hit by someone as he went through a green traffic light, it was his right of way and the other driver jumped a red. The police tried to blame my friend and threatened to charge him with driving without due car and attention
If your friend isn't telling porkies to cover himself, I think he has a case for bringing a charge of police harrasment.
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: time in jail
Driving a car without a licence, insurance, MOT etc, being involved in an accident due to careless wreckless or even dangerous driving should be offensive weapons offences.
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: time in jail
WageSlave1: Agree there comprehensive 'edukasun' is at the root of many problems in the UK.
Going decimal is at the root of many others.
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: time in jail
The clerk involved has been sacked and is likely to be facing criminal charges.
The clerk held a position of trust, which she abused. She deserves the heavy hand of justice.
I blame comprehensive education :rolleyes
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: time in jail
being involved in an accident due to careless wreckless or even dangerous driving
Gads, I'm so sharp today I fear I might cut myself.
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: time in jail
Numpty: I would generally agree, but as Eddie says, once you factor in stupidity a car becomes a lethal weapon, we lock people up for having guns without a licence, we send twocers on go-karting holidays for driving without a licence.
We need at least two pieces of legislation.
1. Culpable manslaughter. If you kill someone or cause someones death whilst doing something stupid, or doing something illegal, if that death could have been avoided had you not done what you did, then you should be held responsible and go to prison for a long time.
2. Driving a car without a licence, insurance, MOT etc, being involved in an accident due to careless wreckless or even dangerous driving should be offensive weapons offences.
Maybe drivers would be a lot more careful about how they drive.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Yesterday 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Nov 27 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
Leave a comment: