Nice of the Telegraph to advertise on behalf of Aston Carter

[SueEllen]

Handy that you can't put comments on there also to rectify the glaring mistakes in the article

Even if you could put it there they would have removed it.

One article yonks ago about houses in a rich area of London they got the details of the surrounding area wrong. I corrected them and within 24 hours my post was removed.

[BoredBloke]

Handy that you can't put comments on there also to rectify the glaring mistakes in the article

[DodgyAgent]

I assume you will send the subscription to the Margaret Thatcher foundation?

Naturally

[BrilloPad]

They also do not know the difference between a headhunter and a recruitment agency. I have cancelled my subscription.

I assume you will send the subscription to the Margaret Thatcher foundation?

[DodgyAgent]

Swap mis-selling staff offered pay worth more than £200,000 a year - Telegraph

A great pity that the Telegraph are way too stupid to understand the difference between contract and permanent staff. They were never like that when I was a young lad.

They also do not know the difference between a headhunter and a recruitment agency. I have cancelled my subscription.

[moggy]

Just imagine for a moment you are fleapit rag journalist. Take £900*5*52. £234000. Ignore bank holidays/holidays/training/Employer NIC/expenses/accountancy/etcetcetc.

Though I am a tad disappointed they did not round up to £240k. Or maybe assume a 7 day working week.

did they not quote how much his house was worth?

[BrilloPad]

Telegraph:
Spectacular fail. Need to work more than 54 weeks per year as well as paying no Employer's NICs.

Just imagine for a moment you are fleapit rag journalist. Take £900*5*52. £234000. Ignore bank holidays/holidays/training/Employer NIC/expenses/accountancy/etcetcetc.

Though I am a tad disappointed they did not round up to £240k. Or maybe assume a 7 day working week.

[Ignis Fatuus]

Swap mis-selling staff offered pay worth more than £200,000 a year - Telegraph

A great pity that the Telegraph are way too stupid to understand the difference between contract and permanent staff. They were never like that when I was a young lad.

Telegraph:

Another London-based job offered “client relationship manager” posts at a rate of £600 to £900. At the top rate, that would be equivalent to an annual salary of about £230,000.

Spectacular fail. Need to work more than 54 weeks per year as well as paying no Employer's NICs.

[BrilloPad]

Swap mis-selling staff offered pay worth more than £200,000 a year - Telegraph

A great pity that the Telegraph are way too stupid to understand the difference between contract and permanent staff. They were never like that when I was a young lad.