• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Nasa Curiosity rover - will it land successfully on Mars ?"

Collapse

  • BS1397
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    I think he designed that crazy retrorocket thing on strings.

    Have they calculated how big the hole it makes will be?
    Enough to fill the Albert Hall, or 4000 holes in Blackburn Lancashire.

    Leave a comment:


  • BS1397
    replied
    Originally posted by adubya View Post
    Bonkers landing strategy involving parachutes deployed at 900mph, jet thrusters lowering the whole caboodle to within 20m of the surface and then the lander lowered down on wires.

    NASA's nuclear Mars tank prepares for high pucker-factor landing ? The Register

    Will it work ?
    That depends, Do we know if Howard Wolowitz designed it?

    Leave a comment:


  • Cliphead
    replied
    Originally posted by alluvial View Post
    I wonder if the guys who designed it played lunar lander much as kids.
    They'll be used to crashing a lot if they did

    Leave a comment:


  • alluvial
    replied
    Originally posted by Cliphead View Post
    Audacity my friend.
    Actually, I think that you've got the right word there, truly audacious.

    I wonder if the guys who designed it played lunar lander much as kids.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cliphead
    replied
    Originally posted by alluvial View Post
    Looking forward to this for some strange indefinable reason. Watched the animation of the landing (planned anyway) and looks truly awesome and if they pull it off, then it is truly hats off to the engineers.
    Audacity my friend.

    Leave a comment:


  • alluvial
    replied
    Looking forward to this for some strange indefinable reason. Watched the animation of the landing (planned anyway) and looks truly awesome and if they pull it off, then it is truly hats off to the engineers.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Absolutely no ******* way. This is way more complicated than a secret warehouse in Area 51

    Leave a comment:


  • Cliphead
    replied
    If it does it will be a temendous achievement, looking forward to this one.

    As long as they don't confuse metric with imperial they've got a chance

    Leave a comment:


  • Nasa Curiosity rover - will it land successfully on Mars ?

    8
    Not a chance
    37.50%
    3
    Hell yeah
    50.00%
    4
    MMMmmmm, maybe
    0.00%
    0
    It's going down faster than AndyW's mum
    12.50%
    1
    Bonkers landing strategy involving parachutes deployed at 900mph, jet thrusters lowering the whole caboodle to within 20m of the surface and then the lander lowered down on wires.

    NASA's nuclear Mars tank prepares for high pucker-factor landing ? The Register

    Will it work ?

Working...
X