• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Gary McKinnon 'no choice' but to refuse medical test"

Collapse

  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    Then let him hang for a couple of weeks like game to tenderize him.

    FTFY

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    Nah.

    Hanging, drawing & quartering, that's the way to do it.
    Then let him hang for a couple of weeks like game to tenderize him.

    Leave a comment:


  • tractor
    replied
    ...

    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    It was irrelevant example, but if you want - of course she would not be extradited because there would be no probable cause.

    There are well established U.S. laws that are supported by weak minded governments now that say that in computer crime being physically in UK but criminal acts to US based firms/computers gives US (or any other country) right to see extradition.

    McKinnon does not even deny he did it (the evidence is overwhelming), he is trying every pathetic trick in the book to avoid getting what he deserved.
    FTFY

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    He asked, if a British woman drives a British car in Britain, should she be extradited to Saudi Arabia for breaking their laws. Answer what was asked.
    It was irrelevant example, but if you want - of course she would not be extradited because there would be no probable cause.

    There are well established laws now that say that in computer crime being physically in UK but criminal acts to US based firms/computers gives US (or any other country) right to see extradition.

    McKinnon does not even deny he did it (the evidence is overwhelming), he is trying every pathetic trick in the book to avoid getting what he deserved.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    If she drove car in Saudi Arabia and broke laws for which extradiction is deemed necessary then yes, why not?
    You're changing the subject, a good 'ol AtW standby.

    He asked, if a British woman drives a British car in Britain, should she be extradited to Saudi Arabia for breaking their laws. Answer what was asked.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
    So you think if a British woman drives a British car in Britain, she should be extradited to Saudi Arabia for breaking their laws?
    If she drove car in Saudi Arabia and broke laws for which extradiction is deemed necessary then yes, why not?

    What McKinnon admitted to have done is a criminal offence in the UK and such crimes are subject to extradictions when they happen.

    And why the hell not? If you don't like it then avoid hacking US Govt sites and leaving tulip messages like this there - " I am SOLO. I will continue to disrupt at the highest levels " - it's only fair he'll contiune this disruption in a federal prison
    Last edited by AtW; 19 July 2012, 13:58.

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    He broke US law, the UK is very easy on such criminals even when they break law here.
    So you think if a British woman drives a British car in Britain, she should be extradited to Saudi Arabia for breaking their laws? The UK is after all very easy on such criminals.

    Leave a comment:


  • tractor
    replied
    ...

    Originally posted by TestMangler View Post
    That's what's wrong with this country. Your government and court system can allow (and assist with) sending some loony to the states to get butt-****ed in a max security jail for doing no damage to anything, but the same system will fight for the rights of a rapist living here illegally in case he gets treated 'unfairly' in his own country.
    "Your G4S can allow... " FTFY

    But I agree entirely with the sentiment of your post. The way things work here is perverse and ludicrous.

    Leave a comment:


  • ZARDOZ
    replied
    Send him to the gallows and if he's been avoiding tax disembowel him first.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gentile
    replied
    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
    there

    If he broke the law he broke the law in Britain. The British police have already investigated and decided not to prosecute. That should have been the end of it.
    WHS. The sooner we stop humouring the prosecution-addicted Americans, the better. They do enough damage to their own society with their draconian approach to 'justice' and distain for human rights. We shouldn't be sending British citizens to be tried within such a demonstrably-corrupt and abusive system.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
    If he broke the law he broke the law in Britain.
    He broke US law, the UK is very easy on such criminals even when they break law here.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    He should be employed by GCHQ, and the Yanks can spin on it.
    Will he pass the clearance or even the IQ test?

    He claimed he could not make screenshots of UFO evidence because he was on slow 56k modem at the time, yet he managed somehow to get to webcam in a hangar with secret techology and I think something along the lines of Excel spreadsheet with details, who would have thought aliens would use Microsoft technology

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
    Forgive me if I am wrong but why should he NOT be sent over their for trial? He broke the law, was caught and admitted breaking the law. Being autisc does not excuse you from acting within the law.
    there

    If he broke the law he broke the law in Britain. The British police have already investigated and decided not to prosecute. That should have been the end of it.

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    He should be employed by GCHQ, and the Yanks can spin on it.
    He would never get security clearance!

    When I worked for the police we had a guy come in on work experience type thing, only problem is he had a similar condition and memorised the number plate of every single Special Branch covert vehicle that was in the workshop

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    He should be employed by GCHQ, and the Yanks can spin on it.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X