Originally posted by Doggy Styles
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Gary McKinnon 'no choice' but to refuse medical test"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by zeitghostNah.
Hanging, drawing & quartering, that's the way to do it.
Leave a comment:
-
...
Originally posted by AtW View PostIt was irrelevant example, but if you want - of course she would not be extradited because there would be no probable cause.
There are well established U.S. laws that are supported by weak minded governments now that say that in computer crime being physically in UK but criminal acts to US based firms/computers gives US (or any other country) right to see extradition.
McKinnon does not even deny he did it (the evidence is overwhelming), he is trying every pathetic trick in the book to avoid getting what he deserved.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Doggy Styles View PostHe asked, if a British woman drives a British car in Britain, should she be extradited to Saudi Arabia for breaking their laws. Answer what was asked.
There are well established laws now that say that in computer crime being physically in UK but criminal acts to US based firms/computers gives US (or any other country) right to see extradition.
McKinnon does not even deny he did it (the evidence is overwhelming), he is trying every pathetic trick in the book to avoid getting what he deserved.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostIf she drove car in Saudi Arabia and broke laws for which extradiction is deemed necessary then yes, why not?
He asked, if a British woman drives a British car in Britain, should she be extradited to Saudi Arabia for breaking their laws. Answer what was asked.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by VectraMan View PostSo you think if a British woman drives a British car in Britain, she should be extradited to Saudi Arabia for breaking their laws?
What McKinnon admitted to have done is a criminal offence in the UK and such crimes are subject to extradictions when they happen.
And why the hell not? If you don't like it then avoid hacking US Govt sites and leaving tulip messages like this there - " I am SOLO. I will continue to disrupt at the highest levels " - it's only fair he'll contiune this disruption in a federal prisonLast edited by AtW; 19 July 2012, 13:58.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostHe broke US law, the UK is very easy on such criminals even when they break law here.
Leave a comment:
-
...
Originally posted by TestMangler View PostThat's what's wrong with this country. Your government and court system can allow (and assist with) sending some loony to the states to get butt-****ed in a max security jail for doing no damage to anything, but the same system will fight for the rights of a rapist living here illegally in case he gets treated 'unfairly' in his own country.
But I agree entirely with the sentiment of your post. The way things work here is perverse and ludicrous.
Leave a comment:
-
Send him to the gallows and if he's been avoiding tax disembowel him first.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by VectraMan View Postthere
If he broke the law he broke the law in Britain. The British police have already investigated and decided not to prosecute. That should have been the end of it.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostHe should be employed by GCHQ, and the Yanks can spin on it.
He claimed he could not make screenshots of UFO evidence because he was on slow 56k modem at the time, yet he managed somehow to get to webcam in a hangar with secret techology and I think something along the lines of Excel spreadsheet with details, who would have thought aliens would use Microsoft technology
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SimonMac View PostForgive me if I am wrong but why should he NOT be sent over their for trial? He broke the law, was caught and admitted breaking the law. Being autisc does not excuse you from acting within the law.
If he broke the law he broke the law in Britain. The British police have already investigated and decided not to prosecute. That should have been the end of it.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostHe should be employed by GCHQ, and the Yanks can spin on it.
When I worked for the police we had a guy come in on work experience type thing, only problem is he had a similar condition and memorised the number plate of every single Special Branch covert vehicle that was in the workshop
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: