• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Barclays inquiry AGAIN"

Collapse

  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    Did they do it because they thought it would be accepted by senior management? Did they do it because they were pressured by senior management to do so? Was there perhaps a culture in which it was so important to hit 'targets' that bending or breaking the law was the only way they could achieve that?
    These questions have been reserved for the Rhetorical Questions Inquiry to be held at a later date.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by NorthWestPerm2Contr View Post
    Good point, the investigation should take place at all levels.
    As long as it doesn't prevent the lynchings.

    Leave a comment:


  • NorthWestPerm2Contr
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    They've started now, but it seems to me it's all very well questioning Diamond, the BoE and so on, but how about questioning the individuals who in Diamond's words were party to 'very bad behaviour by a group of people'?

    Perhaps they can give some insight into why they gave false information; did they do it because they thought they could get away with it? Did they do it because they thought it would be accepted by senior management? Did they do it because they were pressured by senior management to do so? Was there perhaps a culture in which it was so important to hit 'targets' that bending or breaking the law was the only way they could achieve that?
    Good point, the investigation should take place at all levels.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    started a topic Barclays inquiry AGAIN

    Barclays inquiry AGAIN

    They've started now, but it seems to me it's all very well questioning Diamond, the BoE and so on, but how about questioning the individuals who in Diamond's words were party to 'very bad behaviour by a group of people'?

    Perhaps they can give some insight into why they gave false information; did they do it because they thought they could get away with it? Did they do it because they thought it would be accepted by senior management? Did they do it because they were pressured by senior management to do so? Was there perhaps a culture in which it was so important to hit 'targets' that bending or breaking the law was the only way they could achieve that?

Working...
X