Originally posted by Mich the Tester
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Barclays inquiry AGAIN
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Barclays inquiry AGAIN"
Collapse
-
These questions have been reserved for the Rhetorical Questions Inquiry to be held at a later date.
-
As long as it doesn't prevent the lynchings.Originally posted by NorthWestPerm2Contr View PostGood point, the investigation should take place at all levels.
Leave a comment:
-
Good point, the investigation should take place at all levels.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostThey've started now, but it seems to me it's all very well questioning Diamond, the BoE and so on, but how about questioning the individuals who in Diamond's words were party to 'very bad behaviour by a group of people'?
Perhaps they can give some insight into why they gave false information; did they do it because they thought they could get away with it? Did they do it because they thought it would be accepted by senior management? Did they do it because they were pressured by senior management to do so? Was there perhaps a culture in which it was so important to hit 'targets' that bending or breaking the law was the only way they could achieve that?
Leave a comment:
-
Barclays inquiry AGAIN
They've started now, but it seems to me it's all very well questioning Diamond, the BoE and so on, but how about questioning the individuals who in Diamond's words were party to 'very bad behaviour by a group of people'?
Perhaps they can give some insight into why they gave false information; did they do it because they thought they could get away with it? Did they do it because they thought it would be accepted by senior management? Did they do it because they were pressured by senior management to do so? Was there perhaps a culture in which it was so important to hit 'targets' that bending or breaking the law was the only way they could achieve that?Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Six things coming to contractors in 2026: a year of change, caution and (maybe) opportunity Today 06:24
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Yesterday 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Jan 5 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48

Leave a comment: