• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "The 'who's' getting shafted over tax avoidance thread?"

Collapse

  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by k2p2 View Post
    The whole VAT thing is stupid. No VAT on books, but VAT on kindle books? Stoopid.
    In the mid-90s nobody seemed to know what to do with computer books which came with a CD. If I remember correctly the official VAT Handbook had it that if a CD was included, VAT should be charged on the lot.

    Yours truly found a shop which ignored that rule, so I got my Winders Server Resource Kit VAT free. At 150 quid that was a decent saving (OK I was VAT registered so could have got the VAT back, but I wasn't complaining).

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    What about those cheeky ****ers who choose lower paid jobs so they can pay lower rate tax?
    I considered that back in the days of 60% tax. I really wasn't keen on seeing more than 50% of my income going in taxes & NI payments.

    What to do? Stop working and have a much earned holiday?

    Nah! I bought a new car, new computer, fax machine and office furniture!

    Which when you look at it in terms of the bigger economic picture was the Right Thing To Do. I was stimulating the economy with that spending.

    And as a bonus I got some rather nice cheques from the VATman.

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    The whole VAT thing is stupid. No VAT on books, but VAT on kindle books? Stoopid.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
    What about those people who eat in Greggs? Been avoiding VAT for years the bastards. Anyone who's eaten in Greggs should be put in jail surely.
    Well, if there was no VAT on such foods then it's just the way it is.

    Personally I think everything should be VATable at same rate without any exemptions whatsoever.

    This would probably allow to drop income tax rates to levels which would encourage people actually pay tax rather than get into crazy schemes, my plan (no NIC bulltulip - single rate of tax):

    10% for income under £20k
    20% for income in range £20-50k
    30% for income in range £50-100k
    20% for income in range £100-250k
    10% for income in range £250k+

    CGT: 10% for long term holdings, 90% for short term.
    Gambling wins of any kind (including lottery): 90% tax
    Dividends etc - treat as income with tax credit as it is now.
    Corp tax - reflect personal income rates.
    Business rates - removed.
    VAT - 25% on everything (implemented gradually).
    Fuel duties set at level that at least 50% of income goes into roads.
    Booze - higher on retailed stuff and a LOT less for pubs.

    Anybody who fails to pay material amount of tax on time for any reason will be deemed tax evader.

    HTH
    Last edited by AtW; 1 July 2012, 17:15.

    Leave a comment:


  • SupremeSpod
    replied
    Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
    What about those people who eat in Greggs? Been avoiding VAT for years the bastards. Anyone who's eaten in Greggs should be put in jail surely.
    If ever there was a case for retrospective taxation, you're it.

    A fat bastard like you must've got away with hundreds of thousands in unpaid pasty-tax over the past six years.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    There is no tax on ISAs as intended by Parliament, using them you are no more avoiding tax than cooking meal at home instead of buying VATable take away.
    What about those people who eat in Greggs? Been avoiding VAT for years the bastards. Anyone who's eaten in Greggs should be put in jail surely.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
    Ah but the ISA accounts are advertised as a way of saving without paying tax on the interest! That's blatant tax avoidance!
    As I said there is no tax on them because it was intended by Parliament just like no VAT on certain food, given near 0 saving rates in this country it's all academical anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • SupremeSpod
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    There is no tax on ISAs as intended by Parliament, using them you are no more avoiding tax than cooking meal at home instead of buying VATable take away.
    Ah but the ISA accounts are advertised as a way of saving without paying tax on the interest! That's blatant tax avoidance!

    Individual Savings Accounts, or ISAs, provide an easy and tax efficient way for you to build up your long-term savings pot. Crucially, you have no income tax or capital gains tax liability on investments held within an ISA. These tax savings mean your money can work harder, potentially boosting long-term returns.
    Oh how they tease! It's almost like they're enticing you into becoming a "tax avoider"!

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    Those rotten immigrants cooking at home and doing British workers out of British jobs. It's an outrage!
    I don't use ISAs and buy take aways

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    There is no tax on ISAs as intended by Parliament, using them you are no more avoiding tax than cooking meal at home instead of buying VATable take away.
    Those rotten immigrants cooking at home and doing British workers out of British jobs. It's an outrage!

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
    No but earning interest on your savings and not paying income tax on that interest is avoidance, surely.
    There is no tax on ISAs as intended by Parliament, using them you are no more avoiding tax than cooking meal at home instead of buying VATable take away.

    Leave a comment:


  • SupremeSpod
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    It's not avoidance actually, there is no income tax on such activity as explicitly approved by Parliament.

    There is no VAT on food, that does not mean that eating it is tax avoidance.
    No but earning interest on your savings and not paying income tax on that interest is avoidance, surely.

    You're saving money in an ISA and avoiding the tax liability that you would incur in another type of account. That is tax avoidance - true or false?

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
    Still tax avoidance. They're still used by individuals to mitigate their tax liability and therefore depriving the exchequer directly and indirectly us!

    Hang the f*ckers, every last one of 'em.
    What about those cheeky ****ers who choose lower paid jobs so they can pay lower rate tax?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
    Still tax avoidance.
    It's not avoidance actually, there is no income tax on such activity as explicitly approved by Parliament.

    There is no VAT on food, that does not mean that eating it is tax avoidance.

    Leave a comment:


  • SupremeSpod
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Those are ok because they were explicitly created for such reason and their net tax avoidance effect is offset by making people save for the future.

    HTH
    Still tax avoidance. They're still used by individuals to mitigate their tax liability and therefore depriving the exchequer directly and indirectly us!

    Hang the f*ckers, every last one of 'em.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X