Originally posted by AtW
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: A company with 500 directors...
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "A company with 500 directors..."
Collapse
-
AtW you haven't got a clue how to cut our national deficit, so I wouldn't be too hasty criticizing those who have actually had that tulip dropped into their in-basket.Originally posted by AtW View PostTories continue main "victimless" cost cutting that was stated under Liebor - money printing to keep Govts yields low so it can save on what it pays investors into its debt.
If it wasn't for money printing Govt would have to pay 7%+ yields.
Other "cost cutting" is futuristic and mostly on paper, ie - limiting growth of public salaries by using different calculation of inflation.
So instead of cutting actual expenditure 2 years ago they hope that inflation and slower pay raises in public sector will help private sector to have higher GDP sometime in the future.
Leave a comment:
-
Tories continue main "victimless" cost cutting that was stated under Liebor - money printing to keep Govts yields low so it can save on what it pays investors into its debt.Originally posted by Doggy Styles View PostExcept that the socialists raised costs, the tories are cutting them.
If it wasn't for money printing Govt would have to pay 7%+ yields.
Other "cost cutting" is futuristic and mostly on paper, ie - limiting growth of public salaries by using different calculation of inflation.
So instead of cutting actual expenditure 2 years ago they hope that inflation and slower pay raises in public sector will help private sector to have higher GDP sometime in the future.
Leave a comment:
-
Except that the socialists raised costs, the tories are cutting them.Originally posted by AtW View PostLabour will have more or less same policies - should have voted for them last time around
Leave a comment:
-
Funnily enough I see a country with three Tory parties. Whoever is in power, the rich and powerful end up even more so in comparison to the ordinary person.Originally posted by escapeUK View PostThey are still in charge, I have always been a tory voter. What we have now is not conservatives. Its the exact fauxdemocracy we had under labour. This country is finished.
Leave a comment:
-
No Prime Minister who realies on tax cheats to win election will last long...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Doggy Styles View PostCameron has shot himself in the foot with his high moral outburst over this.
I don't care about Cameron, but I do care that he'll lose a General Election and we'll get the socialists back "in charge".
WDSS.
I think Cameron is ok but it is "win at any costs" when labour are about and we all knew the dissection of Tory supporters banking details were going to happen when he opened his trap.
Leave a comment:
-
They are still in charge, I have always been a tory voter. What we have now is not conservatives. Its the exact fauxdemocracy we had under labour. This country is finished.Originally posted by Doggy Styles View PostCameron has shot himself in the foot with his high moral outburst over this.
I don't care about Cameron, but I do care that he'll lose a General Election and we'll get the socialists back "in charge".
Leave a comment:
-
Cameron has shot himself in the foot with his high moral outburst over this.
I don't care about Cameron, but I do care that he'll lose a General Election and we'll get the socialists back "in charge".
Leave a comment:
-
A company with 500 directors...
Imagine having a board meeting in one of those?
------
"One of the Tories' biggest donors was signed up to a tax avoidance scheme that also included comedian Jimmy Carr, the Observer has established.
The revelation is intensely embarrassing for David Cameron, who attacked the comic's use of such schemes as "morally wrong".
Records at Companies House reveal that George Robinson, a hedge fund manager who has given the Tories more than £250,000, was – in the 12 months leading up until 21 January 2010 – a director of a company called Romangate. The Times reported last week that Romangate, which had more than 500 directors, including Carr and Robinson, was part of a tax avoidance strategy called Rushmore. The scheme was closed down in 2009, before its members could claim any tax relief, following an investigation by HMRC.
The scheme was thought to be legitimate when it was set up. However, the then treasury secretary, Stephen Timms, told parliament that the strategy was a "highly abusive, completely contrived arrangement" that "was set up with the sole aim of avoiding paying the tax due to the Exchequer".
Robinson, who has an estimated wealth of £215m and whose Sloane Robinson hedge fund earns millions for its members, has donated money to a number of good causes. There is no suggestion that he benefited from being a director of Romangate because the company was closed down before any tax relief could be claimed."
Source: Top Tory donor linked to Jimmy Carr tax scheme | Business | The Observer
500 directors!!!
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Today 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Yesterday 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11


Leave a comment: