• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "'financial arms races'"

Collapse

  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
    Stick to your search engine.

    This sh!t's too complicated for you.
    WHS

    I'll see you when I buy a house...

    Leave a comment:


  • SupremeSpod
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Then those IB parts should be subject to UK laws in all respects including banking.

    Why do you think they have staff here? Maybe that's why -

    "Meanwhile there is also some unattractive publicity for the London law firm Linklaters and for the now controversial light-touch regulatory culture that existed in the UK till recently.

    The examiner says that the so-called "Repo 105" programme that allowed Lehman to hide that $50bn of assets was not permitted by any US law firm.

    So Lehman obtained an "opinion letter" from Linklaters in London that said the relevant deals were permissible under English law - and the relevant transactions that hid the assets were then conducted through Lehman's London operations."

    Source: BBC - Peston's Picks: Lehman: How $50bn was buried in London

    If costs of staff in London is cheaper for banks to operate then they'd be even more inclined to setup here.
    Stick to your search engine.

    This sh!t's too complicated for you.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Exactly. But London has the important IB part of most banks.
    Then those IB parts should be subject to UK laws in all respects including banking.

    Why do you think they have staff here? Maybe that's why -

    "Meanwhile there is also some unattractive publicity for the London law firm Linklaters and for the now controversial light-touch regulatory culture that existed in the UK till recently.

    The examiner says that the so-called "Repo 105" programme that allowed Lehman to hide that $50bn of assets was not permitted by any US law firm.

    So Lehman obtained an "opinion letter" from Linklaters in London that said the relevant deals were permissible under English law - and the relevant transactions that hid the assets were then conducted through Lehman's London operations."


    Source: BBC - Peston's Picks: Lehman: How $50bn was buried in London

    If costs of staff in London is cheaper for banks to operate then they'd be even more inclined to setup here.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Bonuses for non-UK based banks is the matter for taxpayers/shareholders in respective countries.
    Exactly. But London has the important IB part of most banks.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    But wouyld that work for non UK banks?
    Bonuses for non-UK based banks is the matter for taxpayers/shareholders in respective countries.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    If banks pay bonuses that are huge this means they earn too much and BoE can charge them higher interest on money they lend from it.
    But wouyld that work for non UK banks?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    If banks pay bonuses that are huge this means they earn too much and BoE can charge them higher interest on money they lend from it.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    started a topic 'financial arms races'

    'financial arms races'

    Action Needed To Tackle City Excesses, Bank of England Official Warns

    "returns on equity and executive compensation, rose dramatically in the run-up to the 2008 financial crisis. As banks tried to keep up with their competitors by growing their balance sheets, returns on equity and executive pay spiralled. Generally, the bigger a firm's market value, the bigger the bonus."

    Of course it might help if the banks were not a protected species and market forces applied.

Working...
X