Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Watch the humourless closely: the cocked and furtive way they monitor all conversation, their flashes of panic as irony or exaggeration eludes them, the relief with which they submit to the meaningless babble of unanimous laughter. The humourless can programme themselves to relish situations of human farce or slapstick -- and that’s about it. They are handicapped in the head, or mentally ‘challenged’, as Americans say (euphemism itself being a denial of humour). The trouble is that the challenge wins, every time, hands down. The humourless have no idea what is going on and can’t make sense of anything at all.
You only spelled that correctly because Martin Amis wrote it for you. That wasn't a compliment (or a complement) by the way.
Pardon me for not noticing, I thought jokes had to have an element of humour about them?
Watch the humourless closely: the cocked and furtive way they monitor all conversation, their flashes of panic as irony or exaggeration eludes them, the relief with which they submit to the meaningless babble of unanimous laughter. The humourless can programme themselves to relish situations of human farce or slapstick -- and that’s about it. They are handicapped in the head, or mentally ‘challenged’, as Americans say (euphemism itself being a denial of humour). The trouble is that the challenge wins, every time, hands down. The humourless have no idea what is going on and can’t make sense of anything at all.
I think that is what is known as a "backhanded complement". The book is truly dire, so badly written I would say I've seen better composed 5th form essays in the CSE stream.
I think that is what is known as a "backhanded complement". The book is truly dire, so badly written I would say I've seen better composed 5th form essays in the CSE stream.
Good point - Lord of the Rings in the book is better than the movie, yet the movie is still master class (well, maybe not boring first page, but 3rd is certainly very good): its different stuff and good books are very hard to put in movie.
Have neither read the book nor seen the movie of that Da Vinchi stuff - it gets hyped way too much IMO so expectations of some may be very unreasonable.
Leave a comment: