• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Bring on the chocolate diet"

Collapse

  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by norrahe View Post
    I think it may come down to quality and also the amount of antioxidant compounds, catechins in said chocolate. In the mass produced gunk you get these days is probably negligible.

    I'm sure there are people out there who will use it an an excuse to stuff their faces and wonder why they aren't getting any thinner
    The word "occasionally" does not to me mean "a few times a week", it means that whoever is eating knows when to stop! Unlike some lardy fat bastards!

    Leave a comment:


  • Bacchus
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Interestingly the article says nothing about chocolate quality (though it suggests dark chocolate is better). But quantity unimportant :-

    "And it appears it is how often you eat chocolate that is important, rather than how much of it you eat. The study found no link with quantity consumed."
    ... or is this a euphamism for sex?

    not how much but how often? dark is best?

    the mind boggles

    Leave a comment:


  • Bacchus
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Interestingly the article says nothing about chocolate quality (though it suggests dark chocolate is better). But quantity unimportant :-

    "And it appears it is how often you eat chocolate that is important, rather than how much of it you eat. The study found no link with quantity consumed."
    actually the biggest chocolate consumer that I've ever known didn't carry an ounce of fat, but he was a tree-surgeon and a landscaper which I think has more of a bearing

    If you sit, like many of us, polishing the arse of your trousers all day, it's likely that you will put on a few pounds...

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by norrahe View Post
    I think it may come down to quality and also the amount of antioxidant compounds, catechins in said chocolate. In the mass produced gunk you get these days is probably negligible.

    I'm sure there are people out there who will use it an an excuse to stuff their faces and wonder why they aren't getting any thinner
    Interestingly the article says nothing about chocolate quality (though it suggests dark chocolate is better). But quantity unimportant :-

    "And it appears it is how often you eat chocolate that is important, rather than how much of it you eat. The study found no link with quantity consumed."

    Leave a comment:


  • norrahe
    replied
    I think it may come down to quality and also the amount of antioxidant compounds, catechins in said chocolate. In the mass produced gunk you get these days is probably negligible.

    I'm sure there are people out there who will use it an an excuse to stuff their faces and wonder why they aren't getting any thinner

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    "It found those who ate chocolate a few times a week were, on average, slimmer than those who ate it occasionally."

    Good to see them use exact scientific terms like "few". That has explained that then.
    A "few times a week" and "occasionally" are the same thing surely?

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    "It found those who ate chocolate a few times a week were, on average, slimmer than those who ate it occasionally."

    Good to see them use exact scientific terms like "few". That has explained that then.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bacchus
    started a topic Bring on the chocolate diet

    Bring on the chocolate diet

    oh yeah!


    here


    This will add an interesting slant to the CUK fat club (c:

Working...
X