• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "More Joined Up Government"

Collapse

  • Tex
    replied
    Blimey, if they ban car washes what are all those immigrants running the things going to do?

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by Dalek Supreme
    The only bright side is that John Prescott no longer has the power to concrete over the south-east and build shoddy properties to house them all, putting more strain on already over-stretched resources and infrastructure.
    Including water.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dalek Supreme
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn
    So we let them in and don't keep tabs on them.

    Where's the shock story?
    I know. Depressing, isn't it?

    The only bright side is that John Prescott no longer has the power to concrete over the south-east and build shoddy properties to house them all, putting more strain on already over-stretched resources and infrastructure.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    So we let them in and don't keep tabs on them.

    Some go on to commit crimes and we let them go and don't keep tabs on them.

    Then if anyone employs one, they are fined, so the ones that are here that want to work end up on benefits or move into crime as they cannot work here.

    Goto line 1

    Sounds like New Labour planning and implementation.

    Where's the shock story?

    Leave a comment:


  • The Master
    started a topic More Joined Up Government

    More Joined Up Government

    Illegal immigrants 'not hunted'

    Little effort is made to track down illegal immigrants who lose touch with the authorities, a senior immigration official has admitted.

    David Roberts, of the Immigration and Nationality Directorate (IND), told MPs there was little point in hunting individuals who overstayed their visas. He said resources were better targeted instead on raiding firms which employed illegal workers*. He also said the IND had beaten targets for removing illegal immigrants.

    Mr Roberts, who is head of removals at the directorate, said he did not "have the faintest idea" how many illegal immigrants there were in the UK, although he was aware of estimates suggesting it was about 400,000.

    We are making huge efforts to remove them, but not on the basis of tracing individuals. He also admitted he did not know how many people had been told to leave the country.



    *Why? Because firms employing illegal immigrants can be heavily fined thus generating revenue to help plug Gordo's black hole.

Working...
X