• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Trouble at (Wind)Mill"

Collapse

  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by pjclarke View Post
    Sense of proportion. Least it wasn't a deepwater well failing, killing 11 people and dumping 5 million barrels of crude into the Gulf of Mexico ....

    If you measure a noisy signal starting from an outlier, yes you can get a flat or even negative short-term trend, you can also publically demonstrate your ignorance of statistical significance, and the irrelevance of short term trends...

    How the flip does he do it?

    Never normally says a dickie bird - Yet one whisper of global warming and within a millisecond pjclarke is in there like Flynn

    Leave a comment:


  • pjclarke
    replied
    2009. A good year for the tulips.

    But it is true. For the last 11 years we have not observed any increase in global temperatures.

    And our climate models did not forecast it, even though man-made carbon dioxide, the gas thought to be responsible for warming our planet, has continued to rise.
    It was BS in 2009, it is BS now...
    To state, as Hudson does, then, that “climate models did not forecast [this] even though man-made carbon dioxide, the gas thought to be responsible for warming our planet, has continued to rise” is not only wrong, but staggeringly, bewilderingly wrong. And one only has to look at the evidence he cites to prove it.
    Keeping denial alive at the BBC: the falsehoods of Paul Hudson
    Last edited by pjclarke; 7 January 2012, 00:49.

    Leave a comment:


  • pjclarke
    replied
    Sense of proportion. Least it wasn't a deepwater well failing, killing 11 people and dumping 5 million barrels of crude into the Gulf of Mexico ....

    If you measure a noisy signal starting from an outlier, yes you can get a flat or even negative short-term trend, you can also publically demonstrate your ignorance of statistical significance, and the irrelevance of short term trends...

    Last edited by pjclarke; 7 January 2012, 00:37.

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    2nd highest rated quote on the daily wail

    Sad if true escape from short-terminsim cannot be found in an engineering firm. Although it sounds like there are no engineers.

    No wonder it failed! The board of Evoco consist of seven directors from the retail sector and a racing driver. The only Engineer on the board does not appear to have have previous machine design or manufacturing experience. This is just another fiasco in the farce that is the ''wind energy program''. It is not about energy its about making money. To say they failed because of high winds is criminal. They should be designed to meet winds they should never experience. They should all be shut down until the design has been certified, by a renowned International Design House, that they are Fit For Purpose and can withstand winds of up to at least 150 mph. Which should give a potential safety factor of some 20%


    Read more: Wind turbines can't cope with UK weather as 3 more blown to pieces | Mail Online

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    We'll know it's a real problem when shaunbhoy announces that he no longer contracts to fix mobile communications sites but instead will fix the wind power generators.
    Wind turbine guys/gals must be laughing in the face of recession. No sooner have you put one up than it needs fixing or totally replacing.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    We'll know it's a real problem when shaunbhoy announces that he no longer contracts to fix mobile communications sites but instead will fix the wind power generators.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Must be 10s of thousands of them now, perhaps a few going down a day is normal?

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied

    Are there ones with retractable blades?
    They wouldn't even have to be retractable, just (slightly) twistable.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    It's all worth it to stop the Earth warming.....only it hasn't warmed

    BBC NEWS | Science & Environment | What happened to global warming?

    By Paul Hudson
    Climate correspondent, BBC News

    This headline may come as a bit of a surprise, so too might that fact that the warmest year recorded globally was not in 2008 or 2007, but in 1998.

    But it is true. For the last 11 years we have not observed any increase in global temperatures.

    And our climate models did not forecast it, even though man-made carbon dioxide, the gas thought to be responsible for warming our planet, has continued to rise.

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    started a topic Trouble at (Wind)Mill

    Trouble at (Wind)Mill

    The wind turbines that can’t cope… with the WIND! Three more are blown to pieces in gales that swept across Britain

    Read more: Wind turbines can't cope with UK weather as 3 more blown to pieces | Mail Online
Working...
X