• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "The official "most stupid Sir Merv photo" thread"

Collapse

  • wim121
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Once again, I suspect your attitude would be different if you had retired.
    Being retired shouldn't make you retarded. I guess you are trying to refer to savers, cue the mini violin for those fools.

    Many people, myself included, saw the problems ahead back in 2001. I'm surprised it didn't happen in 2004/2005 like predicted. I was also surprised my bank manager was less versed on his job than i.

    Anyway long point short, in booms, make use of credit, sell off assets. During busts, loan funds out or invest in property.

    Very simple and those of an older age should have acquired more resources and knowledge thus able to adapt better. I have no sympathy for them at all.

    Leave a comment:


  • wim121
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    I thought he's done quite a good job preventing a depression through quantitative easing, something his counterparts in the ECB are refusing to do.
    I actually agree with you. Inflation may be a little high, but under control and no runaway intrest rates like the 80's when it shot up around 15% and even responsible borrowers lost their homes.

    Boom and bust will always happen, but this bust is slightly more under control than others.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    I don't think he has underestimated inflation.
    Both he and his political masters have calculated that inflation is a small price to pay to avoid a bigger conflagration. And they are probably right.
    Of course he has to play the official game in public while doing simething else in reality.
    Once again, I suspect your attitude would be different if you had retired.

    And once the plebs work out that the best policy is to saddle up with loads of debt as it will be inflated away......

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Strictly speaking his job is to manage the committee that keeps inflation at between 1% and 3%. He has continually underestimated inflation.

    No reason why the remit could not be changed to have a target growth rate or something like that.

    But if you had retired would you be happy at seeing your savings continually eroded? And its not nice either for poor families who have an effective inflation rate of closer to 10%(food and energy).

    But I do agree that inflation is the only way out for Eurozone - it will buy a few more years before Eurogedden.
    I don't think he has underestimated inflation.
    Both he and his political masters have calculated that inflation is a small price to pay to avoid a bigger conflagration. And they are probably right.
    Of course he has to play the official game in public while doing simething else in reality.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    I thought he's done quite a good job preventing a depression through quantitative easing, something his counterparts in the ECB are refusing to do.
    Strictly speaking his job is to manage the committee that keeps inflation at between 1% and 3%. He has continually underestimated inflation.

    No reason why the remit could not be changed to have a target growth rate or something like that.

    But if you had retired would you be happy at seeing your savings continually eroded? And its not nice either for poor families who have an effective inflation rate of closer to 10%(food and energy).

    But I do agree that inflation is the only way out for Eurozone - it will buy a few more years before Eurogedden.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Is that a photo of when he found out inflation had actually dropped instead of continually increasing due to his economic mismanagement?
    I thought he's done quite a good job preventing a depression through quantitative easing, something his counterparts in the ECB are refusing to do.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    "Yes!. My sofa arrived"

    Leave a comment:


  • ctdctd
    replied
    Oi - Leave Penfold alone - he's harmless.

    Unlike the gentleman portrayed in the OP.....................

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Is that a photo of when he found out inflation had actually dropped instead of continually increasing due to his economic mismanagement?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by administrator View Post

    Leave a comment:


  • administrator
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    started a topic The official "most stupid Sir Merv photo" thread

    The official "most stupid Sir Merv photo" thread



    Bank of England boosts Mervyn King's pension by £1.4m

Working...
X