Reply to: Limited Company and Divorce

[janey]

I need volunteers to do a "Honey Trap" on John Prescott

OMG... erm...

........taxi please!!!!!!

[privateeye]

kewl!

when does my training start

I need volunteers to do a "Honey Trap" on John Prescott

[janey]

Of course you can - maybe you can explain to me what's going on in some of the photos

kewl!

when does my training start

[privateeye]

privateeye, do your services cover the W. Midlands?

Depends what type of work it is, if it requires lots of personal attendance then I normally decline. If its something that can be mostly done remotely then depends what the job is. There are PI's locally wherever you are. Make sure you get a specialist in whatever you want.

[Swamp Thing]

privateeye, do your services cover the W. Midlands?

[privateeye]

can I be a trainee privateeye?

Of course you can - maybe you can explain to me what's going on in some of the photos

[janey]

.. and they pass some of that on to me to get some interesting photos. No I won't post them on here

can I be a trainee privateeye?

[privateeye]

No, janey, the UK divorce system is designed to maximise lawyer income.

.. and they pass some of that on to me to get some interesting photos. No I won't post them on here

[The Master]

They could all be agents of "The Master" gathering riches for him before he makes his ultimate starategic move!!

Shhhhhh.... mum's the word.

[Swamp Thing]

"No, janey, the UK divorce system is designed to maximise lawyer income."

And to preserve the status quo & block new ideas. To do otherwise would keep their Lordships out of the gentlemen's clubs for too long.

[threaded]

No, janey, the UK divorce system is designed to maximise lawyer income.

[janey]

isn't the whole divorce settlement thing down to times of old when a couple would split but it wasn't "socially acceptable" for women to work so the hubby paid her a yearly "salary" on the understanding she didn't bother him again?

so much for the feminist movement

grrrr

[Swamp Thing]

Be prepared for the settlement percentage to be 60/40. The Income Diminisher may have only been married for 5 minutes and that’s what she’d get. The courts are still too sappy when it assesses the income & capital needs of the ‘woman in distress’, they basically come across all Mary Archer on you (“Has she fragrance?”… etc etc).

Get some ‘directors’ on board and er, pay them the divvys. Or hire some outside ‘consultants’ as previously mentioned. Or wait 10 years to see if our esteemed family law system introduces the concept of blame into assessment of the divorce settlement. That would make ‘em think twice. If you’re not blameless already, start working on it…

[Phoenix]

These Women....

They could all be agents of "The Master" gathering riches for him before he makes his ultimate starategic move!!

[janey]

An income diminisher nonetheless, BP. They all are.

OI!
some of us aren't