• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Mainframe work

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Mainframe work"

Collapse

  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by portseven View Post
    the zBX thing smacks a bit of 'me too'

    They see the world is going towards commodity hardware so they bolt some on the size of a system z - its like the bride of frankenstien
    I remember using Lotus 123 and Wordperfect on a mainframe some 25 years ago, bloody awful. I've been talking with people who were doing testing of ISV software with zBX and they're quite impressed with them, personally can't see any use yet but one day...Don't forget that mainframes were doing virtualisation long before those upstarts such as VMWare and that MVS was the first OS to be fully UNIX (XPG 4.2 IIRC) compliant...

    Leave a comment:


  • AlfredJPruffock
    replied
    Not a patch on good old 370 Assembler - I worked in MFrames for - oh - 12 years - Systems Programmer - VM - MVS DOS-VSE - then the comms stuff VTAM NCP - did it all.

    Oh on the dev side REXX for VM - best thing since 360 assembler.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Learn COBOL and FORTRAN, then you can go FORTH.
    Or PL/1 if you want to really move ahead

    Leave a comment:


  • portseven
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    Just got a couple of z196'es (sadly no zBX frames) which we've now set-up for GDPS. Mainframes, being keeping me in business for over 30 years now and still invoicing well :-)
    the zBX thing smacks a bit of 'me too'

    They see the world is going towards commodity hardware so they bolt some on the size of a system z - its like the bride of frankenstien

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by Normie View Post
    I'm getting some new Solaris toys to play with soon - a T4-1, a T4-2, a T4-4 and some blades for a 6000 chassis -a couple of T4-1b, a storage blade and some x86 blades. Then I've got to try to work out what to do with them.
    Just got a couple of z196'es (sadly no zBX frames) which we've now set-up for GDPS. Mainframes, being keeping me in business for over 30 years now and still invoicing well :-)

    Leave a comment:


  • Normie
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    I fancy a go on one. Bit bored of crappy vmwared windows and even big solaris boxes don't excite me anymore.
    I'm getting some new Solaris toys to play with soon - a T4-1, a T4-2, a T4-4 and some blades for a 6000 chassis -a couple of T4-1b, a storage blade and some x86 blades. Then I've got to try to work out what to do with them.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Learn COBOL and FORTRAN, then you can go FORTH.
    Oh I love COBOL compiler listings.

    "Period missing. Period assumed"

    and then it proceeds as if it hasn't assumed a period at all and throws errors all through the rest of the listing.

    Good work if you can get it.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Learn COBOL and FORTRAN, then you can go FORTH.

    Leave a comment:


  • stek
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    I fancy a go on one. Bit bored of crappy vmwared windows and even big solaris boxes don't excite me anymore.
    Try a monster pSeries, POWER7 795, nice...

    Will run AIX or ppc Linux LPARs, dual VIO's, NPIV, hypervisor in firmware.....

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    Originally posted by Freamon View Post
    A more interesting question would be - why do you want to?
    I fancy a go on one. Bit bored of crappy vmwared windows and even big solaris boxes don't excite me anymore.

    Leave a comment:


  • Freamon
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    How do you get into it from a standing start?
    A more interesting question would be - why do you want to?

    Leave a comment:


  • portseven
    replied
    one route in could be via Linux, a few places that havesystEm z are enabling a few IFLs and putting Linux on them

    I have learnt a few thing at current client due to having to get a Linux capability stood up on z

    Leave a comment:


  • BigTime
    replied
    Originally posted by stek View Post
    Not exactly 'mainframe work' tho is it, knowing a few things to type.
    it's a start and if you want to turn into a bearded freak, nobody will hold you back

    Leave a comment:


  • stek
    replied
    Originally posted by BigTime View Post
    get a contract with a client that has them where your specialisation (say a piece of software on windows or unix) is the key requirement. same goes for as400, tandem & vms. if you know a cross platform product and that's what they need, teaching you a few commands to do the same tulip in a different place isn't a big deal.
    Not exactly 'mainframe work' tho is it, knowing a few things to type.

    Leave a comment:


  • BigTime
    replied
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    How do you get into it from a standing start?
    get a contract with a client that has them where your specialisation (say a piece of software on windows or unix) is the key requirement. same goes for as400, tandem & vms. if you know a cross platform product and that's what they need, teaching you a few commands to do the same tulip in a different place isn't a big deal.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X