Originally posted by doodab
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Nearly bought it
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Nearly bought it"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by BoredBloke View PostIf you take a ford focus as being a typical car length, then 6*4.33m = 25.98m for 6 car lengths. If they only left half a car length between them then that's 38.97m without even getting past the truck.
How, when the op was at the back, did he know that there was a sufficient gap to get his car into 3 cars ahead? I'm guessing that the truck was moving slowly, so the chances are that the cars might be bunched up.
If the truck was 8m in length (a complete guess) then the OP was trying to overtake almost 50m worth of moving traffic. What a pillock!
Leave a comment:
-
If you take a ford focus as being a typical car length, then 6*4.33m = 25.98m for 6 car lengths. If they only left half a car length between them then that's 38.97m without even getting past the truck.
How, when the op was at the back, did he know that there was a sufficient gap to get his car into 3 cars ahead? I'm guessing that the truck was moving slowly, so the chances are that the cars might be bunched up.
If the truck was 8m in length (a complete guess) then the OP was trying to overtake almost 50m worth of moving traffic. What a pillock!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostThat is exactly what old people say. It is the same mentality as those that whine about other people earning more money than they are, or the neighbour peering at next doors new car and checking that it does'nt cost more than theirs. People can leave their petty envies and egos at home and if they are not intending to overtake stop behaving like a flock of selfish sheep and leave gaps between themselves and the car in front.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View PostYeah - old people, selfish envious socialist bastards, they are.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostThat is exactly what old people say. It is the same mentality as those that whine about other people earning more money than they are, or the neighbour peering at next doors new car and checking that it does'nt cost more than theirs. People can leave their petty envies and egos at home and if they are not intending to overtake stop behaving like a flock of selfish sheep and leave gaps between themselves and the car in front.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Spacecadet View PostYou do get some unmarked junctions, especially out in the sticks.
Originally posted by The Highway Code166
DO NOT overtake if there is any doubt, or where you cannot see far enough ahead to be sure it is safe.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by doodab View PostYou shouldn't be overtaking when approaching a junction.
Overtaking (162-169) : Directgov - Travel and transport
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Troll View Post...but the worst accident I have seen is on a single carriageway where a vehicle is overtaking a line of traffic on the other side of the road and a car joining from a junction on the right pulls up to the give way marking, checks right (but not left) and then turns left into the path of the overtaking vehicle.
I still see lots of people joining roads after only checking the traffic coming from the right..
Always wondered how Plod would apportion blame for that accident
Overtaking (162-169) : Directgov - Travel and transport
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by PAH View PostDon't think I could just sit there. I'd rather risk a fine then contest it in court, and if the judge upholds it I'd call him a then get sent down for contempt. Then I'd get really pissed off and it would end in a murder charge.
Its an area of the law that needs changing.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostI know for certain that if you break the law while making way for an emergency vehicle then you are still guilty.
So you're supposed to just sit there and shrug your shoulders while someone may be dying somewhere.
Don't think I could just sit there. I'd rather risk a fine then contest it in court, and if the judge upholds it I'd call him a then get sent down for contempt. Then I'd get really pissed off and it would end in a murder charge.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by PAH View PostI'm sure I read in the Highway Code years ago that it's ok to break the speed limit while overtaking, as it reduces the time you're exposed to danger on the other side of the road.
If it's not there now then it's probably another thing changed when the Matrix had a service pack applied.
IMO that is stupid. But there we go.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostThis is how you do it!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostThat is exactly what old people say. It is the same mentality as those that whine about other people earning more money than they are, or the neighbour peering at next doors new car and checking that it does'nt cost more than theirs. People can leave their petty envies and egos at home and if they are not intending to overtake stop behaving like a flock of selfish sheep and leave gaps between themselves and the car in front.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: