• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Email rule costs me £240"

Collapse

  • IR35 Avoider
    replied
    There was also an "other" category, which is I presume the one that allows them to use their discretion.

    Leave a comment:


  • Freamon
    replied
    Originally posted by IR35 Avoider View Post
    I did. They told me to feck off. (They have a power of discretion, but decided not to use it in this case.)
    Which one of the six grounds did you make a representation under?

    Ground one
    I was not the keeper at the time of the contravention e.g. I have never been the keeper, I ceased to be the keeper, I became the keeper after the date of the contravention
    Ground two
    I had paid the Congestion Charge due for the vehicle used on that date, in the time and manner required by the charging scheme
    Ground three
    No penalty charge is payable under the charging scheme e.g. I was not within the charging area during charging hours
    Ground four
    The vehicle was used or kept without my consent e.g. stolen
    Ground five
    The penalty charge exceeds the amount payable in the circumstances of the case, e.g. I have been requested to pay a penalty charge amount above that detailed in the regulations
    Ground six
    We are a vehicle hire firm and the vehicle was hired under an agreement at the time and the person liable signed a statement of liability for any resulting penalty charges

    Leave a comment:


  • IR35 Avoider
    replied
    Originally posted by MrRobin View Post
    Oops

    Appeal it [them]?
    I did. They told me to feck off. (They have a power of discretion, but decided not to use it in this case.)

    Leave a comment:


  • MrRobin
    replied
    Oops

    Appeal it [them]?

    Leave a comment:


  • milanbenes
    replied
    u r da man

    Milan.

    Leave a comment:


  • IR35 Avoider
    started a topic Email rule costs me £240

    Email rule costs me £240

    Recently I came home to find a brown envelope containing a notice of a £60 fine for not paying the congestion charge. This was a bit of a surprise, as I registered for Congestion Charging autopay when it was introduced at the start of 2011, and have been travelling through the zone without worrying about forgetting to pay ever since. (Autopay is where they automatically charge you whenever they detect your licence plate.)

    I logged in to TFL web site and found the credit card registered with them had expired. The algorithm I follow with regard to credit cards registered on various web sites is to wait for a warning email from each site, then update my registration with the replacement card expiry date.

    Surely they should have sent me a warning, I thought.

    Then I dimly recalled that in the many years before autopay, when I had to login daily to pay, and daily received an email receipt, I had set up a rule to automatically archive the receipts. I searched my archive and found two emails, one notifying me that my monthly payment had failed, and one a few days later saying my autopay was suspended. The suspension was a week before the fine arrived, since when I had travelled through the zone six times. I was able to pay for the current and previous days, leaving me with 4x£60 of fines for the other days.
    Last edited by IR35 Avoider; 22 November 2011, 14:34.

Working...
X