Originally posted by Sysman
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Idiotic New Labour
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Idiotic New Labour"
Collapse
-
Wouldn't it be better just to reduce immigration by 16,000 x 2 (people per house), or dare I say, more?
-
What I heard on Radio 4 this morning was that the taxpayer will fund Mortgage Indemnity Guarantees (MIGs)Originally posted by DimPrawn;1431632[url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/8903125/Taxpayer-to-take-on-mortgage-risks-of-first-time-buyers.htmlTaxpayer to take on mortgage risks of first-time buyers - Telegraph[/url]
The mortgage guarantee, the first time such a scheme has been attempted in the UK, will result in lenders providing loans with significantly lower deposits than the 20 per cent or more that is typically demanded. The taxpayer, however, could be liable for losses in the event that a home is repossessed.
Hmm, someone told me a year or two ago those had been made illegal, I guess they were wrong.
From the Telegraph article:
That'll be the usual suspects such as Barratt them.They also propose subsidising the construction of 16,000 homes by giving £400 million of taxpayers’ money to property developers.
Who incidentally used to use MIGs to cover the expected shortfall between their sales price and the market value.
They did make getting a mortgage easy though.
Tough if you bought one of their studio flats though. Those were nigh on impossible to sell, and I met quite a few folks who got stuck with them. Barratt even build what my parents would have known as back to backs, except they gave them a flashier sounding name.
Same principle though.
Leave a comment:
-
Number10gov: #housingstrategy: any buyer of a new home - not just 1st time buyers - can apply to borrow up to 95% of the value. New strategy to deliver homes and strengthen the economy - Corporate - Department for Communities and Local Government
Original Tweet: Twitter / UK Prime Minister: #housingstrategy: any buye ...
BOOMED BTL Empire here I come.
Leave a comment:
-
Doesn't quite have the same ring to it as 'Ocean Finance', does it ?Originally posted by CheeseSlice View PostWhy dont they go the whole way and even market them as 'Toxic Loans'
Leave a comment:
-
Why dont they go the whole way and even market them as 'Toxic Loans'
Leave a comment:
-
Idiotic New Labour
Ministers consider scheme to guarantee mortgages | Business | The Guardian
Sunday 26 July 2009 17.09 BST
First time home buyers could be thrown a lifeline under plans being considered by the Treasury to underwrite 'risky' mortgages, allowing people with only small deposits to buy homes.
Since the credit crunch took hold, banks have demanded far tougher criteria for lending, asking buyers to provide between 25% and 30% of the price of a home as a deposit.
VS
Idiotic ConDems
Taxpayer to take on mortgage risks of first-time buyers - Telegraph
The mortgage guarantee, the first time such a scheme has been attempted in the UK, will result in lenders providing loans with significantly lower deposits than the 20 per cent or more that is typically demanded. The taxpayer, however, could be liable for losses in the event that a home is repossessed.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Leave a comment: