Reply to: Winding up UKUNCUT

[DodgyAgent]

DA, shouldn't you be shafting them out of their money instead of arguing with them?

I am afraid they are a bit like agents. They dont make any of their own money but instead dedicate their lives to coercing it off everyone else. I am trying to persuade them to take an honest job THEN I screw them

[MarillionFan]

Ah, now I get it; Dodgy was arguing over the margins!

He wanted a cut of their cut. Bris anyone?

[Mich the Tester]

Sounds like a dodgy gay porn website.

Ah, now I get it; Dodgy was arguing over the margins!

[MarillionFan]

Who are or what is 'UKUNCUT'?

Sounds like a dodgy gay porn website.

[Spacecadet]

Oh, the Liberal Democrats.

Sort of, but with more friends

[Mich the Tester]

I've google-oogled them and now I know a bit of what they're about.

Could we perhaps set up 'UKEVENMORECUT' and on my side of the north sea 'EUROLANDEVENMORECUT' for those of us who feel that governments should never spend more than 99% of what they recieved in tax the year before and should put the remaining 1% in a sovereign fund for a rainy day?

Or does that make me a 'fascist'?

[Sockpuppet]

UKUNCUT is sort of the khmer rouge of the UK Unions. Like the US when they gave them aid via a secret back door the unions are doing the same letting their idyllist freedom fighters carry out all the public disorder they don't to want to be seen doing.

[Mich the Tester]

DA, shouldn't you be shafting them out of their money instead of arguing with them?

[OwlHoot]

Who are or what is 'UKUNCUT'?

Cavaliers rather than roundheads, so probably not many muslim or Jewish "members".

[Mich the Tester]

A bunch of noise makers with zero political power or influence

HTH

Oh, the Liberal Democrats.

[Spacecadet]

Who are or what is 'UKUNCUT'?

A bunch of noise makers with zero political power or influence

HTH

[Mich the Tester]

Who are or what is 'UKUNCUT'?

[DodgyAgent]

Dodgy's argument makes total sense, and was as cogently expressed as always.

Although that quote is phrased as a slightly dubious sounding logical inference, it really just makes a couple of related points (a) In a heated emotive debate people usually resort to making ad hominem attacks, and (b) It is reasonable to call out the agendas of your opponents if you feel that is relevant (and that isn't necessarily an ad hominem attack).

So stick that in yer pipe and smoke it SAS

[OwlHoot]

It would help your argument if you made any sense:

"I agree that the "ad hominen argument" is always relevant to how
people debate. It does however legitimise the concept of looking at
the agendas of the people making the arguments"

No it doesn't.

HTH

Dodgy's argument makes total sense, and was as cogently expressed as always.

Although that quote is phrased as a slightly dubious sounding logical inference, it really just makes a couple of related points (a) In a heated emotive debate people usually resort to making ad hominem attacks, and (b) It is reasonable to call out the agendas of your opponents if you feel that is relevant (and that isn't necessarily an ad hominem attack).

[BA to the Stars]

Latest email :

Just let me get clear on this: Is your claim that clergy and academics should not be allowed to protest?
How should I reply?

Reply that everyone has a right, just as you have a right to worship but was prohibited from doing so by the actions of protesters.

They will then confuse themselves and vanish up their own backsides in a huge puff of smoke